On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Olivier Hill wrote:
> What should be MFH'ed?
>
> I haven't touched HEAD with this. I don't have cvs access here, will
> only be able to commit friday.
>
> Is there still regression issues or my last patch fixed it?
Looks fine - I missed your patch on the list though.
regard
What should be MFH'ed?
I haven't touched HEAD with this. I don't have cvs access here, will
only be able to commit friday.
Is there still regression issues or my last patch fixed it?
Thanks
Olivier (Mobile)
On 8/5/08, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 31.07.2008, at 09:18, D
On 31.07.2008, at 09:18, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Olivier Hill wrote:
Indeed, I forgot to test that case. If I remember correctly, there
was
no test cases for that function, so I'll fix this tonight and add
some
tests.
I didn't see a commit - have you forgotten about i
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Olivier Hill wrote:
> Indeed, I forgot to test that case. If I remember correctly, there was
> no test cases for that function, so I'll fix this tonight and add some
> tests.
I didn't see a commit - have you forgotten about it?
regards,
Derick
--
HEAD before 5_3!: http://t
Indeed, I forgot to test that case. If I remember correctly, there was
no test cases for that function, so I'll fix this tonight and add some
tests.
Regards
On 7/28/08, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Olivier Hill wrote:
>
>> ohillWed Jun 25 12:1
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Olivier Hill wrote:
> ohill Wed Jun 25 12:16:17 2008 UTC
>
> Modified files: (Branch: PHP_5_3)
> /php-src/ext/standard string.c
> Log:
> New parameter parsing API
The following change introduces a regression:
@@ -4135,24 +4095,23 @@
