Hi Marcus Boerger, you wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> Wednesday, August 17, 2005, 9:14:50 AM, you wrote:
>>>+ } else if (*property == value) {
>>>+ retval = SUCCESS;
>>>Here you compare the address of a zval, was that intended?
>>>In case you meant it, then i think it cannot be c
Hello Michael,
Wednesday, August 17, 2005, 9:14:50 AM, you wrote:
> Hi Marcus Boerger, you wrote:
>> Hello Michael,
>>
>> a few questions/comments so that i can understand better:
>>
>> 1) Zend/zend_API.c:
>> +ZEND_API int zend_declare_class_constant_stringl(zend_class_entry
>> *ce, char *name,
I wrote:
> Hi Marcus Boerger, you wrote:
>> Before your patch we have the situation that consts can only be
>> decalred in user space. Thus it is ensured that their data is
>> emalloc'd and only ever needs to be const-updated once. Now that
>> you have this as well as your default static propertie
Hi Marcus Boerger, you wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> a few questions/comments so that i can understand better:
>
> 1) Zend/zend_API.c:
> +ZEND_API int zend_declare_class_constant_stringl(zend_class_entry *ce, char
> *name, size_t name_length, char *value, size_t value_length TSRMLS_DC)
> +{
> +
Hello Michael,
a few questions/comments so that i can understand better:
1) Zend/zend_API.c:
+ZEND_API int zend_declare_class_constant_stringl(zend_class_entry *ce, char
*name, size_t name_length, char *value, size_t value_length TSRMLS_DC)
+{
+ zval *constant = new_zval(ce->type & ZEND_I
Hi Michael,
Thanks for sending this. Has anyone else reviewed it already? I'm assuming
that this supports arrays too (unlike today as emalloc needs to be
available for arrays) and has to be created/freed during RINIT/RSHUTDOWN...
Andi
At 03:54 PM 8/12/2005 +0200, Michael Wallner wrote:
The
I wrote:
Though there's already a diff against HEAD, but it's
now about 7 hours old, so it may be inapplicable.
http://dev.iworks.at/PATCHES/
Actually it seems that there were no more commits,
so the available patch should work fine.
Regards,
Mike
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Michael,
can you do this again please for HEAD (no 5.1) now that the major unicode
work is done?
Uhm, not until Tuesday, sorry.
Though there's already a diff against HEAD, but it's
now about 7 hours old, so it may be inapplicable.
http://dev.iworks.at/PATCHES/
Th
Hello Michael,
can you do this again please for HEAD (no 5.1) now that the major unicode
work is done?
marcus
Friday, August 12, 2005, 3:54:58 PM, you wrote:
> The patches are online at:
> http://dev.iworks.at/PATCHES/
> Thanks,
> --
> Michael - < mike(@)php.net >
Best regards,
Marcus
-
The patches are online at:
http://dev.iworks.at/PATCHES/
Thanks,
--
Michael - < mike(@)php.net >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
10 matches
Mail list logo