Johannes Schlüter wrote:
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 18:27 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
I must admit that I think it would be bad to delay 5.3 more and have
another beta because of this,
Well, according to Dmitry (didn't test it myself) this doesn't bring
real improvements so I don't think it'
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 18:27 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> I must admit that I think it would be bad to delay 5.3 more and have
> another beta because of this,
Well, according to Dmitry (didn't test it myself) this doesn't bring
real improvements so I don't think it's needed.
> however if
Hi
2009/3/13 Pierre Joye :
> hi,
>
> Then I would rather have a beta2 and not a RC. This change while being
> great may require more tweaks, and as Marcus suggested, we could push
> APC in too while being at it. I'm all for it (both :).
I must admit that I think it would be bad to delay 5.3 more
hi,
Then I would rather have a beta2 and not a RC. This change while being
great may require more tweaks, and as Marcus suggested, we could push
APC in too while being at it. I'm all for it (both :).
Cheers,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>
> On 11.03.2009, at 17:10,
Hi,
I've fixed all the issues I found in the original patch (attached).
However then I realized that speed-up was caused by bugs that leaded to
render pages in improper way. After fix the speed-up disappear. :(
So now I don't see any reason to include it into 5.3.
Thanks. Dmitry.
Lukas Kahw
On 11.03.2009, at 20:58, shire wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Can we get this patch to release quality by this weekend?
So that people can test it on Monday/Tuesday ahead of RC1?
I don't see this being a problem, I do have a few items I'd like to
point out for feedback/suggestions:
1) C
Hi!
there is no such thing. Let's either do it now or go for 5.4.
Can we please stop trying new big features each time we approach RC? 5.3
is not last PHP version ever, and it's long overdue. Can't we just
release it without putting more and more potentially unstable changes
into it, and th
Hello Lukas,
Wednesday, March 11, 2009, 11:15:23 PM, you wrote:
> On 11.03.2009, at 19:55, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>> Last but not least, Lukas, what happened, to putting APC into core?
> That was planned for PHP 6.0.
there is no such thing. Let's either do it now or go for 5.4.
> regards,
>
On 11.03.2009, at 19:55, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Last but not least, Lukas, what happened, to putting APC into core?
That was planned for PHP 6.0.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteeweet.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.n
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Can we get this patch to release quality by this weekend?
So that people can test it on Monday/Tuesday ahead of RC1?
I don't see this being a problem, I do have a few items I'd like to point out
for feedback/suggestions:
1) Currently it doesn't support method level la
Hello Lukas,
Wednesday, March 11, 2009, 5:10:57 PM, you wrote:
> Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>> Hi Shire,
>>
>> I run patched APC on a number of real-life applications and got more
>> than 30% speedup on XOOPS (99 req/sec instead of 60%) and 20% on
>> ZendFramework (41 req/sec instead of 32), however m
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 11.03.2009, at 17:10, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Anyway, it's very good job and 20-30% speedup on some real-life
applications makes sense to include it into 5.3 (from my point of view).
Makes sense to me as well, especially since I don't see any drawbacks
for non-accele
On 11.03.2009, at 17:10, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Anyway, it's very good job and 20-30% speedup on some real-life
applications makes sense to include it into 5.3 (from my point of
view).
Makes sense to me as well, especially since I don't see any drawbacks
for non-accelerated scripts.
I also t
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Hi Shire,
>
> I run patched APC on a number of real-life applications and got more
> than 30% speedup on XOOPS (99 req/sec instead of 60%) and 20% on
> ZendFramework (41 req/sec instead of 32), however most applications
> (drupal, qdig, typo3, wordpress) didn't show signific
14 matches
Mail list logo