Paul Biggar wrote on 31/03/2009 00:06:33:
>
> I've added a new RFC to the wiki
> (http://wiki.php.net/rfc/remove_zend_api). It details a plan to try
> and decouple the Zend engine from the libraries, in order to allow
> large scale changes to the Zend engine in the future. The RFC
> describes a
Hi Andi,
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> This is something I have considered in the past esp. as it would also reduce
>> dependency of extensions on PHP runtime and make it easier for 3rd parties
>> to distribute PHP extensions which don't have to be rebu
2009/4/1 Johannes Schlüter :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 16:16 +0100, Paul Biggar wrote:
>> I think that to handle more complex cases we need the kind of
>> information which makes it straightforward to easily generate code to
>> make a seamless interface between C and the engine API. The only
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 16:16 +0100, Paul Biggar wrote:
> I think that to handle more complex cases we need the kind of
> information which makes it straightforward to easily generate code to
> make a seamless interface between C and the engine API. The only case
> I had thought of was to someho
Paul Biggar [mailto:paul.big...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 4:07 PM
>> To: PHP Internals
>> Subject: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Removing the Zend API
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've added a new RFC to the wiki
>> (http://wiki.php.net/rfc/remove_zend_api). It
2009/4/1 Johannes Schlüter :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 14:24 +0100, Paul Biggar wrote:
>> > Moreover, in your example in the wiki you don't include how you would do
>> > parameter parsing. Or do you rely on the code generator to look at the C
>> > functions signatures and figure out by itself
ould need to be designed in great detail and we would need to make
sure it is long lasting.
My 2 cents.
Andi
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Biggar [mailto:paul.big...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 4:07 PM
> To: PHP Internals
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Removing the Zen
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 14:24 +0100, Paul Biggar wrote:
> > Moreover, in your example in the wiki you don't include how you would do
> > parameter parsing. Or do you rely on the code generator to look at the C
> > functions signatures and figure out by itself what to do? (actually there is
> > s
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> Hi Paul et all,
>
> I fully understand (and even share) your motivations and goals. However it
> seems to me that describing an extension in PHP will lead to loss of
> performance, as you cannot capture certain C features in PHP. For example,
>
Hi Paul et all,
I fully understand (and even share) your motivations and goals. However it
seems to me that describing an extension in PHP will lead to loss of
performance, as you cannot capture certain C features in PHP. For example,
there are some internal functions that rely on pointer arit
Hi,
I've added a new RFC to the wiki
(http://wiki.php.net/rfc/remove_zend_api). It details a plan to try
and decouple the Zend engine from the libraries, in order to allow
large scale changes to the Zend engine in the future. The RFC
describes a prototype phase of the project, which could reasonab
11 matches
Mail list logo
