On Mon, October 2, 2006 9:15 am, LAUPRETRE François (P) wrote:
> Terje Slettebø wrote :
> I don't know if it is a great idea because you are the only one to be
> interested. Please feel
> free to download and use it
...
> May I say that, on this subject and others, I am quite disappointed by
> th
LAUPRETRE François (P) wrote:
May I say that, on this subject and others, I am quite disappointed by the attitude of people
on this mailing list. I tried to get some reactions about two projects I had been working on
during several months (the Autoload handler and the PHK manager) and the few on
Terje Slettebø wrote :
> I think this sounds like a great idea. :) We do something similar with our
> class loader, in
> that it scans a lib-directory and its subfolders, building a map of class
> name to filename
> (it doesn't open the files - it only builds the map based on file naming
> con
Hi François.
I think this sounds like a great idea. :) We do something similar with our
class loader, in that it scans a lib-directory and its subfolders, building
a map of class name to filename (it doesn't open the files - it only builds
the map based on file naming convention, allowing it to in
Yes, the trivial answer is to name each file after the symbol it contains, but
it limits to one symbol per file (and I was talking about autoloading constants
! :-).
Once again, if we don't propose a smarter autoload manager, extending the
autoload feature to functions is not very interesting b
