Greg Beaver wrote:
> The solution I've found for pharring things has involved clever use of
> str_replace(). I pharred up phpMyAdmin and it works just great using this
> technique. This removes the need for an include_path hack.
phpMyAdmin is an interesting test case because every file access
Greg Beaver wrote :
> Allowing stream wrappers in include_path will open a potentially gigantic
> security hole, making sure that it is closed will be a huge challenge, and
> introduce a bit of overhead.
I don't understand where the security hole would be. I see the stream wrappers
as
virtual d
Thanks for your answer,
I have been searching for an alternate way for more than one month now but I
still
don't see any way to resolve the problem of relative includes in packaged files.
The goal, here, is to package an existing software with as few modifications as
possible. It is the only w
But, once again, may I humbly ask you to
focus on my primary question, instead of
arguing about a potential alternative to PHAR.
And I also repeat that my question is of
great interest for PHAR too.
I think it's an interresting, yet ultimately inefficient idea. I would
recommend that if you *re
LAUPRETRE François (P) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am currently implementing a packaging tool in PHP. If you know PHAR, it is
> the same kind of tool, which allows to implement a virtual file tree in a
> single physical file.
>
> In such a tool, every file path becomes a 'stream-wrapped' path and t
On 7/11/06, Robin Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/11/06, Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/11/06, LAUPRETRE François (P) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe. But I couldn't find any documentation about it and its features. And
its
> > 'Download latest' link is broken. I had to d
On 7/11/06, Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/11/06, LAUPRETRE François (P) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe. But I couldn't find any documentation about it and its features. And
its
> 'Download latest' link is broken. I had to download the C source code from
CVS.
It is not broken, ther
On 7/11/06, LAUPRETRE François (P) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marcus Boerger wrote :
> have you ever looked at pecl/phar? It can do that already.
Maybe. But I couldn't find any documentation about it and its features. And its
'Download latest' link is broken. I had to download the C source code
Marcus Boerger wrote :
> have you ever looked at pecl/phar? It can do that already.
Maybe. But I couldn't find any documentation about it and its features. And its
'Download latest' link is broken. I had to download the C source code from CVS.
But, once again, may I humbly ask you to focus on my