Hello LAUPRETRE,
to cut this short. Noone tried to overrule anyone and noone tried to
outsmart or trick in any sense either. In the past we decided on the
following. First it is to early to ring in Phar for a variety of reasons. As
development went on it was more than appropriate for the RM to a
> From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > 14) Link phar extension from PECL into core (possibly enabling it by
> > default)
>
> -1, we discussed why :) 0 if not enabled by default.
Yes, it was discussed, and I thought it was clear for everybody that phar had
to remain
in pecl
