Gaetano Giunta wrote:
As a side note: does anyone think that providing on pecl4win compiled
versions corresponding to the official pecl package releases besides the
"compiled from cvs" versions would be a good idea?
Yes, the way it works at present does bother me. For this reason, in my
extens
Hello,
getting back to the original point of Philips email. What is the
relation between PECL, especially for packages that make it into core?
Does making it into core mean that the PECL package is removed (unless
the developer in question is willing to continue maintance)?
Or is it maybe ti
Yes, and the binaries are generated on the same box as the windows releases.
--Wez.
On 5/29/07, Richard Quadling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Isn't PECL4WIN "official"? It's on the php.net domain.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/
Sorry about the poor choice of words.
"Official" === Got a version number and can be downloaded on pecl.php.net
Take APC as an example:
latest pecl version = 3.0.14, released on 2007/04/02
latest cvs version = files apc_shm.h and apc_rfc1867.c, 6 days ago
pecl4win version = compiled on 2007-05-29
On 5/29/07, Richard Quadling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Isn't PECL4WIN "official"? It's on the php.net domain.
" the official pecl package releases", you missed the word "releases" :)
I do think that having DLLs based on the releases (like zip-1.8.10 for
example) would be a very good thing. I'
Isn't PECL4WIN "official"? It's on the php.net domain.
On 29/05/07, Gaetano Giunta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a side note: does anyone think that providing on pecl4win compiled
versions corresponding to the official pecl package releases besides the
"compiled from cvs" versions would be a g
As a side note: does anyone think that providing on pecl4win compiled
versions corresponding to the official pecl package releases besides the
"compiled from cvs" versions would be a good idea?
Bye
Gaetano
On 5/29/07, Richard Quadling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My post about SNAPS and PECLS a
My post about SNAPS and PECLS a little while ago seems relevant to this.
As a windows user, I have to rely on pre-compiled binaries.
It was/is my understanding that SNAPS would provide me with most
currently succesfully compiled PHP, with some extensions built in and
some extensions for my ext d
Just to add my experience (even though the original poster explicitly
asked for single extensions not to be mentioned) from a
not-completely-unrelated problem: some extensions have an "internal"
version number that is not always updated when the userland API of said
extension is changed - see e
