Would that be so hard to distinguish in the parser? If it is, I'd be grateful
to know why.
We already have it in now. Changing it for cosmetics would break
existing code, and I have not yet understood for what benefit?
Touching back on what I mentioned earlier about PHP not having an inheren
We still don't have a way to auto load non class entities. Other than that,
PSR-0 does solve the majority of autoload use cases.
Cheers,
David
Sent from my iPhone
On 04/02/2013, at 5:18 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On 02/03/2013 08:51 PM, Matt Wilson wrote:
>> Hello all. I'd like to start by
On 02/03/2013 08:51 PM, Matt Wilson wrote:
Hello all. I'd like to start by saying that I am by no means an expert on the
subject at hand, and my knowledge is limited to pretty much basic C/C++. I have
done little more than patch and write ad hoc extensions for PHP in the past.
I'm not looking
> This is something of a wet dream of mine
TMI, my friend. TMI.
Anyway... I think your Subject is unnecessarily trolly even if the
substance of your post isn't. So maybe you could re-post with a "WAS:
Questioning..." to avoid p'ing off the dev team?
If I'm understanding your statement of "The a
Hello all. I'd like to start by saying that I am by no means an expert on the
subject at hand, and my knowledge is limited to pretty much basic C/C++. I have
done little more than patch and write ad hoc extensions for PHP in the past.
I'm not looking to criticize so much, as I'm just interested
