On Mon, Aug 19, 2019, at 1:26 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I'm on vacation so only at a high level:
>
> - If it's anything remotely similar to the one for P++ (abrupt, done
> without any coordination with the author, goes into a vote with
> immediate effect, grossly misrepresents the idea while ref
I'm on vacation so only at a high level:
- If it's anything remotely similar to the one for P++ (abrupt, done without
any coordination with the author, goes into a vote with immediate effect,
grossly misrepresents the idea while refusing to fix that even after the fact,
pretends to be an RFC ev
Morning internals,
I've got a sort of fuzzy idea to make provisions in the RFC process for
preliminary polling.
It seems there are several situations where a preliminary poll makes sense,
it would have made sense for the p++ discussion and saved us a week of
wasted time. It also makes sense when
