On So, 2018-02-04 at 01:53 -0800, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> - Section support - I think besides TEST, the following will be
> needed:
> * XFAIL: unfortunately, those are still needed
> * ENV: there are a lot of environment-dependent tests as it seems
> * FILE_EXTERNAL: is pretty widely used
> * T
Hi!
> There is a project I've created a long time ago and still maintaining
> (https://github.com/nazar-pc/phpt-tests-runner) that should be able to run
> most of the tests without changes already with colored output and the whole
> thing is a fraction of run-tests.php's size.
Some notes:
- I
Hi!
On 1/31/18 2:50 AM, Nazar Mokrynskyi wrote:
> The idea is to make filenames more descriptive and sufficient for
> displaying in test results.
Descriptive - sure, that'd be great, why not. Sufficient - won't happen.
Filenames are not meant to describe complex things, are not suitable for
it a
On 31 January 2018 at 10:50, Nazar Mokrynskyi wrote:
> The idea is to make filenames more descriptive and sufficient for
> displaying in test results. This doesn't prevent or discourage anyone from
> including description in test file itself when more details need to be
> included.
>
Would you
The idea is to make filenames more descriptive and sufficient for displaying in
test results. This doesn't prevent or discourage anyone from including
description in test file itself when more details need to be included.
Moreover, all of the characters from mentioned title are allowed for use i
Hi!
> For instance, it is painful to work with tests in PHP source tree when they
> are called 001.phpt, 002.phpt and so on - you need to open each file and read
> it to see what it intends to test. My tool uses file names instead, which
> makes browsing source tree with tests more productive a
It was never intended to be a wrapper or to be 100% compatible.
It was created as a simpler and modern replacement with additional features
like colored output (tried to add this to run-tests.php initially, even
submitted PR with some fixes and refactoring, but found it too complex to deal
with)
This is a reimplementation of run-test.php, not just a wrapper (so its
another parser for the PHPT file format). However, its missing support for
many PHPT sections (ie its PHPT format support is incomplete).
See:
https://github.com/nazar-pc/phpt-tests-runner/blob/master/bin/phpt-tests-runner#L117
Hi internals,
As most of you know, there is this script called run-tests.php which is huge in
size and hard to maintain.
I also heard some wanted it to support parallel tests execution and probably
other things.
There is a project I've created a long time ago and still maintaining
(https://gi
