RE: [PHP-DEV] Patch for GD

2003-04-02 Thread John Coggeshall
OTECTED] >Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch for GD > > >IMO we should not enable a buggy function, the output may be >un expected and >if it results in memory corruption we could end with a fairly >annoying and >hard to trace problem. > >Ilia > >On April 2, 2003 09

Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch for GD

2003-04-02 Thread Ilia A.
IMO we should not enable a buggy function, the output may be un expected and if it results in memory corruption we could end with a fairly annoying and hard to trace problem. Ilia On April 2, 2003 09:54 pm, John Coggeshall wrote: > Here's a patch for the GD lib.. I'd like to commit this if ther

Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch for GD

2003-04-02 Thread Sterling Hughes
John, Please separate the patches for review. I have a feeling that some might not be desirable (the first), while other portions look good. -Sterling On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 21:54, John Coggeshall wrote: > Here's a patch for the GD lib.. I'd like to commit this if there is no > objection. It do

[PHP-DEV] Patch for GD

2003-04-02 Thread John Coggeshall
Here's a patch for the GD lib.. I'd like to commit this if there is no objection. It does a few things: 1) Creates a warning for imagepscopyfont()... It's in the docs and right now its completely commented out in the source... For BC this really should not just completely disappear (even if T1Lib