Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP vs PHP NTS benackmark (win32)

2008-07-17 Thread Jochem Maas
Thank you everyone for you replies, apparently I know a little more than I thought in general and also a little more than this morning. :-) rgds, Jochem Andi Gutmans schreef: There are some things I mention in this blog entry re: why I think ... -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mail

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP vs PHP NTS benackmark (win32)

2008-07-17 Thread Andi Gutmans
gt; Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP vs PHP NTS benackmark (win32) > > Hi! > > > a, what are the ramifications of having to run php without threading > > when we live in a world that's increasingly moving towards > > multi-core/multi- CPU systems? > > I'd

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP vs PHP NTS benackmark (win32)

2008-07-17 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
Hi! a, what are the ramifications of having to run php without threading when we live in a world that's increasingly moving towards multi-core/multi- CPU systems? I'd say next to none, since multi-CPU systems are perfectly capable of running multiple processes and PHP lives in the context of

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP vs PHP NTS benackmark (win32)

2008-07-17 Thread Scott MacVicar
Jochem Maas wrote: David Zülke schreef: Am 17.07.2008 um 11:36 schrieb Mario Brandt: I made a test on my console (cmd.exe) ENV: WinXP SP 3 all updates, PHP 5.2.6 / PHP 5.2.6 non thread safe (NTS) Intel Celeron 2.4 GHz 1 GB DDR Ram It showed that the non thread safe is faster than the thr

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP vs PHP NTS benackmark (win32)

2008-07-17 Thread Jochem Maas
David Zülke schreef: Am 17.07.2008 um 11:36 schrieb Mario Brandt: I made a test on my console (cmd.exe) ENV: WinXP SP 3 all updates, PHP 5.2.6 / PHP 5.2.6 non thread safe (NTS) Intel Celeron 2.4 GHz 1 GB DDR Ram It showed that the non thread safe is faster than the thread safe version. And

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP vs PHP NTS benackmark (win32)

2008-07-17 Thread Pierre Joye
hi, On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Mario Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I made a test on my console (cmd.exe) > ENV: WinXP SP 3 all updates, PHP 5.2.6 / PHP 5.2.6 non thread safe (NTS) > Intel Celeron 2.4 GHz 1 GB DDR Ram > > It showed that the non thread safe is faster than the thread sa

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP vs PHP NTS benackmark (win32)

2008-07-17 Thread Runar Olsen
Hi, That should be correct as there is no time spent keeping internal variables thread safe. Mario Brandt skrev: I made a test on my console (cmd.exe) ENV: WinXP SP 3 all updates, PHP 5.2.6 / PHP 5.2.6 non thread safe (NTS) Intel Celeron 2.4 GHz 1 GB DDR Ram It showed that the non thread sa

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP vs PHP NTS benackmark (win32)

2008-07-17 Thread David Zülke
Am 17.07.2008 um 11:36 schrieb Mario Brandt: I made a test on my console (cmd.exe) ENV: WinXP SP 3 all updates, PHP 5.2.6 / PHP 5.2.6 non thread safe (NTS) Intel Celeron 2.4 GHz 1 GB DDR Ram It showed that the non thread safe is faster than the thread safe version. And your point/questi

[PHP-DEV] PHP vs PHP NTS benackmark (win32)

2008-07-17 Thread Mario Brandt
I made a test on my console (cmd.exe) ENV: WinXP SP 3 all updates, PHP 5.2.6 / PHP 5.2.6 non thread safe (NTS) Intel Celeron 2.4 GHz 1 GB DDR Ram It showed that the non thread safe is faster than the thread safe version. NTS Benchmark Time Peak MemoryPeak Memory (Real) -