At 02:20 PM 19/7/2003 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I commited this patch.
Note that the post concerned the _thread_ stack limit. As
such, !(defined(ZTS) && defined(HPUX)) sounds more
reasonable.
Yes you are right. I thought that this concer
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I commited this patch.
Note that the post concerned the _thread_ stack limit. As
such, !(defined(ZTS) && defined(HPUX)) sounds more
reasonable.
- Sascha
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: ht
I commited this patch.
Andi
At 12:58 PM 19/7/2003 +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
Possibly better one (not tested):
Index: Zend/zend.h
===
RCS file: /repository/ZendEngine2/zend.h,v
retrieving revision 1.210
diff -u -r1.210 zend.h
-
Possibly better one (not tested):
Index: Zend/zend.h
===
RCS file: /repository/ZendEngine2/zend.h,v
retrieving revision 1.210
diff -u -r1.210 zend.h
--- Zend/zend.h 10 Jun 2003 20:03:24 - 1.210
+++ Zend/zend.h 19 Jul 2003 03:
A few months back i submitted a bug report #21855 and forgotten about it.
In short ...certain complex enough scripts would cause PHP to crash and burn
on HPUX. The gdb backtraces and the fault generated seemed to indicate that
memory access was beging performed in the guard pages located just beyo
