Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP is not ...

2013-01-11 Thread Clint Priest
I can't disagree with some of your sentiments, that new things are being developed while there are some "old things" that are incomplete or in dis-repair. Unfortunately, PHP being developed as it is, there are only so many people able to work on the core. My own story with php-core was like

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP is not ...

2013-01-11 Thread Florin Razvan Patan
Hi Arvids, This is exactly what I've stated yesterday here, you can read it at http://news.php.net/php.internals/64820 but I've yet to receive an answer for it. The problem is that someone will actually need to implement the whole thing again, in C, again, and it's going to be painful (again).

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP is not ...

2013-01-11 Thread Arvids Godjuks
I have to agree with Lester. It seems that there is a conspiracy to push annotations into PHP :D No, really, it's like goons decided that PHP needs annotations no matter what and just flooded the mailing list. I think: "The line must be drawn here, this far, no further!" © Star Trek Before adding

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP is not ...

2013-01-11 Thread Thomas Hruska
On 1/11/2013 2:44 AM, Lester Caine wrote: Some of you will have heard this before, but please bare with me ... The folks on this list don't need to see you naked. -- Thomas Hruska CubicleSoft President I've got great, time saving software that you might find useful. http://cubiclesoft.com/

[PHP-DEV] PHP is not ...

2013-01-11 Thread Lester Caine
Some of you will have heard this before, but please bare with me ... A number of years ago I needed a new infrastructure to produce 'web based' versions of the windows client code I've been writing since window 3.1 days. I'd been using C++ for many years and still have to support that code. C#