On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Remi Collet
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le 24/09/2014 09:33, Ferenc Kovacs a écrit :
>
> > We could have used the same NEWS entry from 5.6 I suppose: . Fixed
> > bug #67606 (revised fix 67541, broke mod_fastcgi BC). (David
> > Zue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 24/09/2014 09:33, Ferenc Kovacs a écrit :
> We could have used the same NEWS entry from 5.6 I suppose: . Fixed
> bug #67606 (revised fix 67541, broke mod_fastcgi BC). (David
> Zuelke)
>
I fixed NEWS in 5.4 / 5.5 "before" the release (5.4.33 / 5.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le 11/09/2014 09:19, Remi Collet a écrit :
> > Le 11/09/2014 09:16, Remi Collet a écrit :
> >> Le 09/09/2014 07:54, Stas Malyshev a écrit : The big issue I
> >> see, is the news entry:
> >
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 11/09/2014 09:19, Remi Collet a écrit :
> Le 11/09/2014 09:16, Remi Collet a écrit :
>> Le 09/09/2014 07:54, Stas Malyshev a écrit : The big issue I
>> see, is the news entry:
>
>> . Fixed #65641 (PHP-FPM incorrectly defines the SCRIPT_NAME
>> var
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 11/09/2014 09:16, Remi Collet a écrit :
> Le 09/09/2014 07:54, Stas Malyshev a écrit : The big issue I see,
> is the news entry:
>
> . Fixed #65641 (PHP-FPM incorrectly defines the SCRIPT_NAME
> variable when using Apache). (David Zuelke)
Should p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 09/09/2014 07:54, Stas Malyshev a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> So what is the resolution for this? Should we roll back the fix,
> implement the new one and have one more RC, do something else?
>
Sorry, it seems I have miss your question :(
As David Zuelke
On 05.09.2014, at 10:54, Remi Collet wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le 05/09/2014 15:52, David Zuelke a écrit :
>
>> People should simply use the SetHandler approach instead.
>
> I agree, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1136290
>
> But some people may want to use
The fix is not broken. He's describing a different/additional issue. Things
have always been shaky with ProxyPass (that's
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=65641) because it's a bag of hurt. That's the
whole reason Apache now has SetHandler for proxies!
On 08.09.2014, at 22:54, Stas Malyshev wr
Hi!
So what is the resolution for this? Should we roll back the fix,
implement the new one and have one more RC, do something else?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 05/09/2014 15:52, David Zuelke a écrit :
> People should simply use the SetHandler approach instead.
I agree, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1136290
But some people may want to use ProxyPass (ex, to redirect to another
server, with no PHP script
The fixes in that ticket were pretty risky as they very late in the game
fiddled with strings. That was brittle should have been fixed earlier during
request processing.
The new patch
(https://bugs.php.net/patch-display.php?bug=65641&patch=Another_fix_for_mod_proxy_fcgi.patch&revision=140992288
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 05/09/2014 14:54, Philip Hofstetter a écrit :
> Applying the patch fpm_main-script_name-v2.patch proposed on
> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=65641 fixes the issue for me.
This patch doesn't check for tflag, which seems usefull...
Another try
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
> 2. ProxyPass Configuration
>
> ProxyPass /proxy/ fcgi://127.0.0.1:9003//var/www/html/
>
> URL = /proxy/info.php/a/b?q=a
> SCRIPT_NAME = /proxy/info.php/a/b
> => Broken
This is bugging me too on my development machine where I'm stuck at
Ap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Running a test build of 5.4.33RC1.
Testing the fix for the SCRIPT_NAME issue
1. SetHandler Configuration
SetHandler "proxy:fcgi://127.0.0.1:9003"
URL = /info.php/a/b?q=a
SCRIPT_NAME = /info.php
=> OK
2. ProxyPass Configuration
14 matches
Mail list logo