On 1/4/2015 2:59 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
2015.01.04. 4:13 ezt írta ("David Muir" ):
On 4 Jan 2015, at 12:34 pm, Thomas Hruska
wrote:
On 1/3/2015 4:56 PM, David Muir wrote:
Shouldn't this be directed to the webmaster mailing list?
php-
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
> 2015.01.04. 4:13 ezt írta ("David Muir" ):
>>
>>
>> > On 4 Jan 2015, at 12:34 pm, Thomas Hruska
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 1/3/2015 4:56 PM, David Muir wrote:
>> >> Shouldn't this be directed to the webmaster mailing list?
>> >> php-webmas.
2015.01.04. 4:13 ezt írta ("David Muir" ):
>
>
> > On 4 Jan 2015, at 12:34 pm, Thomas Hruska
wrote:
> >
> >> On 1/3/2015 4:56 PM, David Muir wrote:
> >> Shouldn't this be directed to the webmaster mailing list?
php-webmas...@lists.php.net
> >
> > See below. They said that they don't have access t
> On 4 Jan 2015, at 12:34 pm, Thomas Hruska wrote:
>
>> On 1/3/2015 4:56 PM, David Muir wrote:
>> Shouldn't this be directed to the webmaster mailing list?
>> php-webmas...@lists.php.net
>
> See below. They said that they don't have access to that server. :)
>
>
Ah, missed that part. So w
On 1/3/2015 4:56 PM, David Muir wrote:
Shouldn't this be directed to the webmaster mailing list?
php-webmas...@lists.php.net
See below. They said that they don't have access to that server. :)
On 4 Jan 2015, at 4:45 am, Thomas Hruska wrote:
On 12/28/2014 4:47 PM, Thomas Hruska wrote:
Shouldn't this be directed to the webmaster mailing list?
php-webmas...@lists.php.net
Sent from my iPhone
> On 4 Jan 2015, at 4:45 am, Thomas Hruska wrote:
>
>> On 12/28/2014 4:47 PM, Thomas Hruska wrote:
>>> On 12/7/2014 10:52 PM, Thomas Hruska wrote:
On 11/29/2014 6:27 AM, Thomas Hruska
On 12/28/2014 4:47 PM, Thomas Hruska wrote:
On 12/7/2014 10:52 PM, Thomas Hruska wrote:
On 11/29/2014 6:27 AM, Thomas Hruska wrote:
On 11/15/2014 12:13 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
Good point. They will remain in the archives part. We kept them after
eol
just in case there was a last min critical up
On 12/7/2014 10:52 PM, Thomas Hruska wrote:
On 11/29/2014 6:27 AM, Thomas Hruska wrote:
On 11/15/2014 12:13 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
Good point. They will remain in the archives part. We kept them after
eol
just in case there was a last min critical update (we had one
actually :)
I will remove t
On 11/29/2014 6:27 AM, Thomas Hruska wrote:
On 11/15/2014 12:13 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
Good point. They will remain in the archives part. We kept them after eol
just in case there was a last min critical update (we had one actually :)
I will remove them asap.
Bump.
5.3 binaries still on the
On 11/15/2014 12:13 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
Good point. They will remain in the archives part. We kept them after eol
just in case there was a last min critical update (we had one actually :)
I will remove them asap.
Bump.
On Nov 15, 2014 1:45 PM, "Thomas Hruska" wrote:
PHP 5.3 was remove
Good point. They will remain in the archives part. We kept them after eol
just in case there was a last min critical update (we had one actually :)
I will remove them asap.
On Nov 15, 2014 1:45 PM, "Thomas Hruska" wrote:
> PHP 5.3 was removed from the website earlier today (a good thing).
> Howe
PHP 5.3 was removed from the website earlier today (a good thing).
However, the Windows binaries remain:
http://windows.php.net/download/
Oddly, the webmaster group claims to not have access to that section of
the website:
http://news.php.net/php.webmaster/20275
Possibly consider granting a
12 matches
Mail list logo
