The PHP development team would like to announce the immediate
availability of PHP 5.2.10. This release focuses on improving the
stability of
the PHP 5.2.x branch with over 100 bug fixes, one of which is security
related. All users of PHP are encouraged to upgrade to this release.
Security E
Giovanni Giacobbi wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:04:36PM +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> hi Ilia,
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Andrei Zmievski
>> wrote:
>>> Jani Taskinen wrote:
It's still new stuff. And we need more things in 5.3/6 to make them more
interesting to general p
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:04:36PM +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi Ilia,
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Andrei Zmievski
> wrote:
> > Jani Taskinen wrote:
> >>
> >> It's still new stuff. And we need more things in 5.3/6 to make them more
> >> interesting to general populus too. ;)
> >
> > Gr
Sorry Hannes - forgot to change To address!
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 21:25, Lester Caine wrote:
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 18:45, Lester Caine wrote:
Since 5.3 DOES require some work to port legacy applications over
Do you have a quick list of th
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 21:25, Lester Caine wrote:
> Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 18:45, Lester Caine wrote:
>>> Since 5.3 DOES require some work to port legacy applications over
>>
>> Do you have a quick list of things that is required so we can document
>> them, or mayb
Hi!
We have a fair number of fixes in the 5.2 branch already and while 5.3
is making very good progress I think it is still ways off in terms of
final release and stabilization. I think it makes sense to do one more
5.2 release before 5.3 is out and 5.2 can be discontinued. I would like
to ro
Not yet. It's a simple declaration change for json_encode_r(), but json_decode() doesn't
have json_decode_r(), so we'd need to create it from the guts of json_decode().
-Andrei
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
If we are simply changing the declaration that should be fine, is there
a patch available for
If we are simply changing the declaration that should be fine, is
there a patch available for review?
Ilia Alshanetsky
On 14-May-09, at 4:04 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
hi Ilia,
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Andrei Zmievski > wrote:
Jani Taskinen wrote:
It's still new stuff. And we nee
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Andrei,
There is no question about functionality being useful for some people.
But what is the point of different branches if we put whatever we want
into each branch? We may as well stick to one branch and commit
features, bug fixes, etc... into it.
I would fully ag
hi Ilia,
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> Jani Taskinen wrote:
>>
>> It's still new stuff. And we need more things in 5.3/6 to make them more
>> interesting to general populus too. ;)
>
> Great, so I'll just end up copying almost all of ext/json code into
> pecl/memcached
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 18:45, Lester Caine wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
We have a fair number of fixes in the 5.2 branch already and while 5.3 is
making very good progress I think it is still ways off in terms of final
release and stabilization. I think it makes sens
Andrei,
There is no question about functionality being useful for some people.
But what is the point of different branches if we put whatever we want
into each branch? We may as well stick to one branch and commit
features, bug fixes, etc... into it.
Ilia Alshanetsky
On 14-May-09, at 2:5
Maybe only allow people who ran make test and submitted the results
during the RC phase to submit bugs, eh? ;-)
Ilia Alshanetsky
On 14-May-09, at 2:49 PM, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky kirjoitti:
We have a fair number of fixes in the 5.2 branch already and while
5.3 is making ver
Jani Taskinen wrote:
It's still new stuff. And we need more things in 5.3/6 to make them more
interesting to general populus too. ;)
Great, so I'll just end up copying almost all of ext/json code into pecl/memcached then.
Hooray for loose coupling.
-Andrei
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Dev
Ilia Alshanetsky kirjoitti:
We have a fair number of fixes in the 5.2 branch already and while 5.3
is making very good progress I think it is still ways off in terms of
final release and stabilization. I think it makes sense to do one more
5.2 release before 5.3 is out and 5.2 can be discontinu
It's still new stuff. And we need more things in 5.3/6 to make them more
interesting to general populus too. ;)
--Jani
Andrei Zmievski kirjoitti:
It doesn't impact anything though, does it? And it would really help for
implementing json-based serializers (such as for memcached).
-Andrei
I
It doesn't impact anything though, does it? And it would really help for implementing
json-based serializers (such as for memcached).
-Andrei
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
This is a new feature, so it would be more appropriate for 5.3/6 more so
then for 5.2 IMHO.
Ilia Alshanetsky
On 14-May-09,
This is a new feature, so it would be more appropriate for 5.3/6 more
so then for 5.2 IMHO.
Ilia Alshanetsky
On 14-May-09, at 1:39 PM, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
We have a fair number of fixes in the 5.2 branch already and while
5.3 is making very good progress I thi
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
We have a fair number of fixes in the 5.2 branch already and while 5.3
is making very good progress I think it is still ways off in terms of
final release and stabilization. I think it makes sense to do one more
5.2 release before 5.3 is out and 5.2 can be discontinued.
IMHO, 5.2 should be stopped as soon as 5.3.0 is released.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Shadle wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>>> We have a fair number of fixes in the 5.2 branch alre
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>> We have a fair number of fixes in the 5.2 branch already and while 5.3 is
>> making very good progress I think it is still ways off in terms of final
>> release and stabiliza
Hi,
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> We have a fair number of fixes in the 5.2 branch already and while 5.3 is
> making very good progress I think it is still ways off in terms of final
> release and stabilization. I think it makes sense to do one more 5.2 release
> befo
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 18:45, Lester Caine wrote:
> Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>>
>> We have a fair number of fixes in the 5.2 branch already and while 5.3 is
>> making very good progress I think it is still ways off in terms of final
>> release and stabilization. I think it makes sense to do one mo
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
We have a fair number of fixes in the 5.2 branch already and while 5.3
is making very good progress I think it is still ways off in terms of
final release and stabilization. I think it makes sense to do one more
5.2 release before 5.3 is out and 5.2 can be discontinued.
We have a fair number of fixes in the 5.2 branch already and while 5.3
is making very good progress I think it is still ways off in terms of
final release and stabilization. I think it makes sense to do one more
5.2 release before 5.3 is out and 5.2 can be discontinued. I would
like to roll
25 matches
Mail list logo
