Re: [PHP-DEV] PDO Bug introduced in revision 290786 and released in 5.2.12 and 5.3.1

2010-01-26 Thread Derick Rethans
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Johannes Schlüter wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 20:54 -0500, Matt Read wrote: > > We are developers from the Habari Project, an open source PHP blogging > > application; We would like to raise concern with a recent change to the > > logic of PDO. > > > > We believe that PHP'

Re: [PHP-DEV] PDO Bug introduced in revision 290786 and released in 5.2.12 and 5.3.1

2010-01-26 Thread Pierrick Charron
I agree that for the PDO and mysqli, if I put my OO-puristic side away, it can make some sense to call the constructor after initialization of the object. I agree that those changes can be reverted but this really have to be well documented. About the Tidy one (Bug #50558), there I'm not sure... I

Re: [PHP-DEV] PDO Bug introduced in revision 290786 and released in 5.2.12 and 5.3.1

2010-01-26 Thread Johannes Schlüter
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 20:54 -0500, Matt Read wrote: > We are developers from the Habari Project, an open source PHP blogging > application; We would like to raise concern with a recent change to the > logic of PDO. > > We believe that PHP's revision 290786 [1] should not have been committed > (see

[PHP-DEV] PDO Bug introduced in revision 290786 and released in 5.2.12 and 5.3.1

2010-01-15 Thread Matt Read
We are developers from the Habari Project, an open source PHP blogging application; We would like to raise concern with a recent change to the logic of PDO. We believe that PHP's revision 290786 [1] should not have been committed (see bug 49521 [2]). This changed the behaviour of PDO so that an ob