It's hard to pick a default that will work for everyone. I can probably
see setting recursion limit somewhat lower than backtracking one,
though. Maybe 100,000/50,000 or something like that.
-Andrei
On Apr 11, 2006, at 11:51 AM, Nuno Lopes wrote:
I would say that 100.000 recursions is too muc
I would say that 100.000 recursions is too much. When I made my patch it was
segfaulting with such value. 50.000 is a much safer choice (at least on my
gentoo box, 8 MB of stack).
Nuno
- Original Message -
I made a patch (against HEAD currently only) that makes it possible to set
ru
Sounds to me like a bug fix..all those recursion bugs in the db.. :)
--Jani
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
I made a patch (against HEAD currently only) that makes it possible to set
runtime limits on backtracking and recursion. It also implements
preg_last_error() that l
I made a patch (against HEAD currently only) that makes it possible to
set runtime limits on backtracking and recursion. It also implements
preg_last_error() that lets users check whether there was an execution
error (such as limit exceeded or bad UTF-8 or whatever).
Ilia, do you think it migh
