Oups. Haven't noticed the attachment. I will try to attach the file again.
2010/2/10 Sokolov Evgeniy :
> No problem. I will remember for the future
>
> 2010/2/10 Pierre Joye :
>> Can you attach the patch instead of copying it in your post? Simply
>> name it mypatch.txt (.txt is important for the l
No problem. I will remember for the future
2010/2/10 Pierre Joye :
> Can you attach the patch instead of copying it in your post? Simply
> name it mypatch.txt (.txt is important for the list).
>
> 2010/2/10 Sokolov Evgeniy :
>> Thank you very much. This patch is passed, also as other patches from
Can you attach the patch instead of copying it in your post? Simply
name it mypatch.txt (.txt is important for the list).
2010/2/10 Sokolov Evgeniy :
> Thank you very much. This patch is passed, also as other patches from
> this extension. It's time for choose next bug :)
>
>
>
> Index: ext/pgsql/
Thank you very much. This patch is passed, also as other patches from
this extension. It's time for choose next bug :)
Index: ext/pgsql/tests/bug47199.phpt
===
--- ext/pgsql/tests/bug47199.phpt (revision 0)
+++ ext/pgsql/tests
Hi Skolov:
> I just run "php tests/27_bug47199.phpt" and check the result output.
> Is this correct way?
Use an EXPECT or EXPECTF section. See http://qa.php.net/phpt_details.php
for more information.
Thanks,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
If anyone ever needs me to host a patch, there's more than enough
room at patch.joeysmith.com, just email me the patch as an attachment
off-list. It'd probably be better than relying on a pastebin.
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 04:38:44PM +0100, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2010-02-09 at
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 20:11 +0500, Sokolov Evgeniy wrote:
> > did you really run this test and was it successful? - doesn't looklike
> > for me.
> I just run "php tests/27_bug47199.phpt" and check the result output.
> Is this correct way?
The easy way to run it using the test Framework is by
> did you really run this test and was it successful? - doesn't looklike
> for me.
I just run "php tests/27_bug47199.phpt" and check the result output.
Is this correct way?
>> Property changes on: tests/27_bug47199.phpt
> This isn't needed.
Okey, I just use previous test in this dir as example.
Евгений,
thanks for the patch.I didn't fully review it but I wonder about a
thing:
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 16:27 +0500, Соколов Евгений wrote:
> Index: tests/27_bug47199.phpt
> ===
> --- tests/27_bug47199.phpt(revision 0)
> +++ tes
Index: tests/27_bug47199.phpt
===
--- tests/27_bug47199.phpt (revision 0)
+++ tests/27_bug47199.phpt (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+--TEST--
+Bug #47199 pg_delete fails on NULL
+--SKIPIF--
+
+--FILE--
+ NULL,
'not_null_field
10 matches
Mail list logo
