On 12/1/05, Jared White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still say its main selling point is
> that the calling code is its own API documentation.
why don't you just write something like
cycle(/* name: */ "myCycle", /* values: */ "#ee;#d0d0d0", /*
print: */ false,
/* reset: */ true, /* delimite
On Dec 1, 2005, at 11:16 AM, Sebastian Kugler wrote:
On 12/1/05, Jared White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I still say its main selling point is
that the calling code is its own API documentation.
why don't you just write something like
cycle(/* name: */ "myCycle", /* values: */ "#ee;#d0d0d
On Dec 1, 2005, at 6:59 AM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Ron Korving wrote:
Named parameter example:
Your example misses the main advantage of named parameters IMHO:
Sets of parameters you don't want to or can't explicitely list
because they are not know yet.
function adduser($params)
Ron Korving wrote:
Named parameter example:
Your example misses the main advantage of named parameters IMHO: Sets of
parameters you don't want to or can't explicitely list because they are
not know yet.
function adduser($params)
{
if (!is_array($params)) throw new Exception('No nam
You could use an associative array, but then you have a not-so-clean syntax
and you have to handle default values for missing parameters yourself.
Named parameter example:
Traditional named example:
'root', 'password' => 'abcdefg', 'superuser'
=> true));
?>
You see the big advantages of na
Sorry... Forget I said that...
Bart de Boer wrote:
Hi Jared,
If probably don't understand named arguments correclty but couldn't you
do something like:
function(array('name1' => 'val1', 'name2' => $var));
In the function you could then check which keys (names) have values,
thereby simulati
Hi Jared,
If probably don't understand named arguments correclty but couldn't you
do something like:
function(array('name1' => 'val1', 'name2' => $var));
In the function you could then check which keys (names) have values,
thereby simulating a form of named agruments?
On Nov 29, 2005, a
On Nov 30, 2005, at 1:50 PM, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Can you explain your reasoning behind "essential for using PHP as a
solid templating language" and "nothing is a good substitute for
the real deal"?
- Andrei
OK, to take an example from Smarty, you could do a value cycle (for
multi-row-
Can you explain your reasoning behind "essential for using PHP as a
solid templating language" and "nothing is a good substitute for the
real deal"?
- Andrei
On Nov 29, 2005, at 11:17 PM, Jared White wrote:
Named arguments are absolutely essential for using PHP as a solid
templating language
Hi folks,
I just got on the list -- I've been a big fan of PHP for several
years and am throughly enjoying PHP 5. Good work folks, and once I
can get 5.1 set up on my OS X box I'm sure it's be even better.
I've been very interested in hearing about PHP 6 feature discussions,
and the meeti
10 matches
Mail list logo
