It's already committed and will be in 4.3.3.
--Jani
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Pete Dishman wrote:
>Excellent,
>
>If this does get committed, will it make it in to 4.3.3 ?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Pete Dishman
>
>"Ilia Alshanetsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On J
Excellent,
If this does get committed, will it make it in to 4.3.3 ?
Thanks,
Pete Dishman
"Ilia Alshanetsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On July 28, 2003 10:48 am, Pete Dishman wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm currently developing an extension and believe I've found
On July 28, 2003 10:48 am, Pete Dishman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently developing an extension and believe I've found a memory leak
> in virtual_realpath(). My extension is calling this function via the macro
> VCWD_REALPATH().
You are quite correct, virtual_realpath does indeed appear to leak. I
Hi,
I'm currently developing an extension and believe I've found a memory leak
in virtual_realpath(). My extension is calling this function via the macro
VCWD_REALPATH().
It seems this function allocates memory with CWD_STATE_COPY() but then never
frees it. This also seems to be the case in virt