I have not reviewed the patch in its entirety but the concept and the
code that I did read appear to be fine for 5.2 inclusion by me.
Ilia Alshanetsky
On 30-May-06, at 3:15 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello,
i guess i don'T get an answer to this do i?
Saturday, May 27, 2006, 10:32:13 PM
Let me second that. This was a long weekend in the US and I am just
getting to my email now as well. Some of us, for our own sanity, do
occasionally tune out for a couple of days.
-Rasmus
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Marcus,
Saturday when you sent this was the weekend which lasted until this
morni
Marcus,
Saturday when you sent this was the weekend which lasted until this
morning here in the US (and I happened to be away for the weekend). I
am now busy catching up on all emails so by tomorrow I'll probably be
able to respond.
I suggest in future to give people adequate time to read emai
Hello,
i guess i don'T get an answer to this do i?
Saturday, May 27, 2006, 10:32:13 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Andi, Zeev, Ilia,
> the attached patch adds three new functions that make calling
> functions a lot easier - at least for me in SPL. And it also does
> a few things correct which are p
Hello Andi, Zeev, Ilia,
the attached patch adds three new functions that make calling
functions a lot easier - at least for me in SPL. And it also does
a few things correct which are probably overseen easily. The
addition works in HEAD already and paases all memcheck tests idid
so far.
Best reg
