Re: [PHP-DEV] Latest phpize.in change screws up shared extensions on Mac OS X

2005-01-25 Thread Jani Taskinen
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Andrei Zmievski wrote: On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Jani Taskinen wrote: We do link the binaries and libphp*.so without libtool so why not the shared extensions too. :) Exactly. Can we do that or is that already done? :) Already done. --Jani -- PHP Internals - PHP Runti

Re: [PHP-DEV] Latest phpize.in change screws up shared extensions on Mac OS X

2005-01-25 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
The new bundled libtool seems unhappy on fbsd as well. Trying --with-gd=shared gives me: /bin/bash /homes/rasmus/php43/libtool --silent --preserve-dup-deps --mode=link gcc -DPHP_ATOM_INC -I/homes/rasmus/php43/include -I/homes/rasmus/php43/main -I/homes/rasmus/php43 -I/homes/rasmus/php43/Zend

Re: [PHP-DEV] Latest phpize.in change screws up shared extensions on Mac OS X

2005-01-25 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Andrei Zmievski wrote: Thus we'll nuke the libtool usage in linking on Macosx. Patch to acinclude.m4 for this solution is here: http://www.php.net/~jani/patches/acinclude.m4.macosx-shared- modules.patch (or someone backports the patches from newer libtools to the bundled file

Re: [PHP-DEV] Latest phpize.in change screws up shared extensions on Mac OS X

2005-01-25 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Jani Taskinen wrote: > We do link the binaries and libphp*.so without libtool so > why not the shared extensions too. :) Exactly. Can we do that or is that already done? :) - Andrei -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http:

Re: [PHP-DEV] Latest phpize.in change screws up shared extensions on Mac OS X

2005-01-25 Thread Jani Taskinen
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Andrei Zmievski wrote: On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Jani Taskinen wrote: I've done a little work on HEAD to make it require autoconf 2.59 and bundle libtool 1.5.10 so this patch might not be necessary there. But as I don't know if anybody else wishes to start requiring newe

Re: [PHP-DEV] Latest phpize.in change screws up shared extensions on Mac OS X

2005-01-25 Thread Andrei Zmievski
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Jani Taskinen wrote: > I've done a little work on HEAD to make it require autoconf 2.59 > and bundle libtool 1.5.10 so this patch might not be necessary there. > > But as I don't know if anybody else wishes to start requiring newer > autoconf as of PHP 5.1.x, I

Re: [PHP-DEV] Latest phpize.in change screws up shared extensions on Mac OS X

2005-01-25 Thread Jani Taskinen
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Andrei Zmievski wrote: Thus we'll nuke the libtool usage in linking on Macosx. Patch to acinclude.m4 for this solution is here: http://www.php.net/~jani/patches/acinclude.m4.macosx-shared- modules.patch (or someone backports the patches from newer libtools to

Re: [PHP-DEV] Latest phpize.in change screws up shared extensions on Mac OS X

2005-01-24 Thread Andrei Zmievski
Thus we'll nuke the libtool usage in linking on Macosx. Patch to acinclude.m4 for this solution is here: http://www.php.net/~jani/patches/acinclude.m4.macosx-shared- modules.patch (or someone backports the patches from newer libtools to the bundled files =) Reason not to

Re: [PHP-DEV] Latest phpize.in change screws up shared extensions on Mac OS X

2005-01-22 Thread Jani Taskinen
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Andrei Zmievski wrote: What was the reasoning behind the 1.15->1.16 patch for phpize.in? Your comments say: - Changed phpize not to require automake and libtool. - Fixed build system to always use bundled libtool files. a) To only require autoconf to be installed to be abl

[PHP-DEV] Latest phpize.in change screws up shared extensions on Mac OS X

2005-01-20 Thread Andrei Zmievski
Jani, What was the reasoning behind the 1.15->1.16 patch for phpize.in? Your comments say: - Changed phpize not to require automake and libtool. - Fixed build system to always use bundled libtool files. This had an unfortunate effect of building shared extensions on Mac OS X as .dylib shared lib