On 10.06.2009, at 16:43, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
June 10th (today):
We package RC3, until then only critical
build fixes and similar which have to go in the RC, after review
(highlight me on IRC, mail etc.)
June 11th:
RC3 will be released
June 11th-17th
A small window for critical fixes
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> Oh, very nice, Paul ;) I wasn't aware of this script.
> btw, does it perform inlining of included files? (so that you can have a
> self-contained reduced file)
phc supporting inlining with --include. So I would guess that calling
$reduce->set_ph
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote:
PS: If someone wants to give a hand to find the regression... I can
explain how to reproduce.
The easiest way is to use a tool to help reducing the test case
automatically.
I don't know about any specific tool for reducing PHP files, but in the
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Paul Biggar wrote:
> I wrote a tool which automatically. It uses the delta debugging
I sent this prematurely. It should read
"I wrote a tool which reduces test cases automatically."
> algorithm, but is very much faster than delta, since it knows how PHP
> works.
Hi Guilherme, Nuno,
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote:
>> PS: If someone wants to give a hand to find the regression... I can
>> explain how to reproduce.
>
> The easiest way is to use a tool to help reducing the test case
> automatically.
> I don't know about any specific tool for
PS: If someone wants to give a hand to find the regression... I can
explain how to reproduce.
The easiest way is to use a tool to help reducing the test case
automatically.
I don't know about any specific tool for reducing PHP files, but in the past
I've used delta (http://delta.tigris.org/),
On 10.06.2009, at 16:43, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
Hi,
it was a long run so far and it's time to really take the last steps
to
get the beast out.
For this Lukas and I decided on the following plan:
June 10th (today):
We package RC3, until then only critical
build fixes and similar which
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 12:14 -0300, Guilherme Blanco wrote:
> 1- Will it include new autoloader definition that standards group was
> talking about?
No proposal, no code, ...
> 2- I still have a BC break that I cannot isolate (huge codebase). I'm
> trying to find it and once I isolate it and
Greg,
I joined the standards group last week.
It seems they already have a patch but it was not yet officially
proposed because none reached a common agreement yet.
Group switched with PEAR style of proposal and voting. So anyone can
propose new inclusions.
The patch is actually just a direct che
On 10.06.2009, at 17:33, Greg Beaver wrote:
Guilherme Blanco wrote:
Just 2 questions
1- Will it include new autoloader definition that standards group was
talking about?
no .. there was no proposal, therefore no discussion, therefore its
not going to be included, since we are long pa
Guilherme Blanco wrote:
> Just 2 questions
>
> 1- Will it include new autoloader definition that standards group was
> talking about?
Hi,
I am not an official RM representative, the following is my opinion:
Not the slightest chance. It hasn't even been suggested to internals
yet and additi
Just 2 questions
1- Will it include new autoloader definition that standards group was
talking about?
2- I still have a BC break that I cannot isolate (huge codebase). I'm
trying to find it and once I isolate it and report, will the fix be
included before 5.3.0 final?
PS: If someone wants t
Hi,
it was a long run so far and it's time to really take the last steps to
get the beast out.
For this Lukas and I decided on the following plan:
June 10th (today):
We package RC3, until then only critical
build fixes and similar which have to go in the RC, after review
(highlight me on I
13 matches
Mail list logo
