On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Tjerk Meesters
wrote:
> Hi Ferenc,
>
> On 31 Aug, 2014, at 7:00 pm, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Tjerk Meesters
> wrote:
>
>> Hi internals (again),
>>
>> Recently I’ve done a small assessment on how feasible it is to remove
>>
On 31 Aug 2014, at 20:34, Chris Wright wrote:
> I have on occasion come across code that uses split(), more often than not
> as if it were explode() with a literal delimiter.
>
> If ereg is to be removed (for which I am +1) does anyone have any
> objections to making split() into an alias of ex
I have on occasion come across code that uses split(), more often than not
as if it were explode() with a literal delimiter.
If ereg is to be removed (for which I am +1) does anyone have any
objections to making split() into an alias of explode()? This would also be
consistent with the join() -> i
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> Heck... No :)
>
> Or we mark it as dead right away, single release for the sake of it and let
> it die.
I think a single, unmaintained release of ext/ereg in PECL would be
acceptable, but I don't really see the point of that either. If you
sti
Heck... No :)
Or we mark it as dead right away, single release for the sake of it and let
it die.
On Aug 31, 2014 2:08 PM, "Tjerk Meesters" wrote:
> Hi Ferenc,
>
> On 31 Aug, 2014, at 7:00 pm, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Tjerk Meesters <
> tjerk.meest
+1
Kill it with fire and throw more gasoline ontop of the fire.
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Tjerk Meesters
wrote:
> Hi Ferenc,
>
> On 31 Aug, 2014, at 7:00 pm, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Tjerk Meesters <
> tjerk.meest...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
Hi Ferenc,
On 31 Aug, 2014, at 7:00 pm, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Tjerk Meesters
> wrote:
> Hi internals (again),
>
> Recently I’ve done a small assessment on how feasible it is to remove
> ext/ereg from the project for the next major version. This is t
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Tjerk Meesters
wrote:
> Hi internals (again),
>
> Recently I’ve done a small assessment on how feasible it is to remove
> ext/ereg from the project for the next major version. This is the result
> (so far):
>
> https://github.com/datibbaw/php-src/compare/kill-ereg
Hi internals (again),
Recently I’ve done a small assessment on how feasible it is to remove ext/ereg
from the project for the next major version. This is the result (so far):
https://github.com/datibbaw/php-src/compare/kill-ereg
I’ve replaced two instances of ereg with their pcre equivalents, O
