Hello Andi, hello all
Monday, March 1, 2004, 3:46:56 PM, you wrote:
> As I said I'm indifferent. It would be nice to have Marcus in this
> discussion but he's on the PHP Cruise and I'm not sure how often he's
> checking is email.
never. Today i am back and checked 1K8 mails :-(
I'll change it
As I said I'm indifferent. It would be nice to have Marcus in this
discussion but he's on the PHP Cruise and I'm not sure how often he's
checking is email.
At 09:21 AM 3/1/2004 -0500, Hans Lellelid wrote:
Hi -
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Well we don't have very much time anymore because I want to roll
Hi -
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Well we don't have very much time anymore because I want to roll RC1
ASAP (assuming that we get a couple of bugs fixed which need fixing).
Personally I'm fine with either of these (I don't mind hasMore()) but
a decision has to be reached quickly. From discussing with Ma
Well we don't have very much time anymore because I want to roll RC1 ASAP
(assuming that we get a couple of bugs fixed which need fixing).
Personally I'm fine with either of these (I don't mind hasMore()) but a
decision has to be reached quickly. From discussing with Marcus I don't
think he feel
Hi Marcus,
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Philip Fletcher wrote:
Looking at the documentation, the comments and method name (for hasMore())
do not have the same meaning - the comment is saying 'does the current
element exist?' and the method name says 'are there any more elements?'.
At the risk of making a complete fool of myself, I'd like to ask the smarter
brains than me to checkout the current logic in the implementation of
Iterator classes and foreach().
The current logic of foreach( $obj as $key => $val ) { ... } where $obj
implements Iterator, is:
for($obj->rewind(); $
Hello Philip,
have a look at it's dokumentation: ext/spl/spl.php
there you'll find that hasMore() needs to be checked before an access to
key() or current() can be done. Hence it's meaning is somewhat like
isValid().
regards
marcus
Thursday, February 26, 2004, 4:53:50 PM, you wrote:
> At the ri
Thanks Marcus
Looking at the documentation, the comments and method name (for hasMore())
do not have the same meaning - the comment is saying 'does the current
element exist?' and the method name says 'are there any more elements?'.
This makes the api very ambiguous - hasMore() and isValid() have
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Philip Fletcher wrote:
> Thanks Marcus
>
> Looking at the documentation, the comments and method name (for hasMore())
> do not have the same meaning - the comment is saying 'does the current
> element exist?' and the method name says 'are there any more elements?'.
>
> This m
Sorry for follow-up to myself, but it would be somewhat easier to just
rename hasMore() to isValid() and then implement hasMore() after PHP5 goes
gold.
Philip Fletcher wrote:
> Whilst I appreciate adding an isValid() method to the Iterator interface
> is not trivial (and I am loath to suggest a c
Hello Philip,
just to make it clear. hasMore() would be the exact same then isValid()
only the name would change. The semantic is already what you refer to as
isValid.
Thursday, February 26, 2004, 9:43:40 PM, you wrote:
> Sorry for follow-up to myself, but it would be somewhat easier to just
> r
Hi Marcus
Yes, the current implementation of hasMore() has an identical semantic to
isValid().
The generally understood semantic of isValid() and hasMore() are quite
different - hence the need for the rename.
Regards
Philip
Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Hello Philip,
>
> just to make it clear. has
Hello Philip,
Thursday, February 26, 2004, 10:05:09 PM, you wrote:
> Hi Marcus
> Yes, the current implementation of hasMore() has an identical semantic to
> isValid().
> The generally understood semantic of isValid() and hasMore() are quite
> different - hence the need for the rename.
As a sid
Marcus Boerger wrote:
> As a side note: There is no generally understood hasMore().
I strongly disagree - the Java Iterator has a hasNext() method which is the
exact sementic of hasMore().
> Though there
> is isDone() and hasMore() is sometimes used/implemented as !isDone(). The
> main problem
14 matches
Mail list logo
