On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:44:03 +0100, mathieu.suen
wrote:
On 08/06/2010 04:42 PM, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:33:18 +0100, mathieu.suen
wrote:
For now you can only index an array using a scalar type or a string.
Is there some rfc or work going on to enlarge the possibility s
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 13:47 +0200, mathieu.suen wrote:
> > outputs ...
> >
> > Array
> > (
> > [1365443950] => First
> > [1235256771] => Second
> > [520059180] => Third
> > [486985268] => Fourth
> > )
>
> Well that is not the expected behavior since if you call array_keys y
On 08/06/2010 07:46 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
For now you can only index an array using a scalar type or a string.
Is there some rfc or work going on to enlarge the possibility so that it
is possible to have some other object like:
I think SplObjectStorage implements most common use-case f
On 08/06/2010 04:44 PM, Richard Quadling wrote:
On 6 August 2010 15:33, mathieu.suen wrote:
Hi,
For now you can only index an array using a scalar type or a string.
Is there some rfc or work going on to enlarge the possibility so that it is
possible to have some other object like:
- closu
On 08/06/2010 04:42 PM, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:33:18 +0100, mathieu.suen
wrote:
Hi,
For now you can only index an array using a scalar type or a string.
Is there some rfc or work going on to enlarge the possibility so that it
is possible to have some other object like:
On 06/Aug/10 6:20 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 16:33, mathieu.suen wrote:
Hi,
For now you can only index an array using a scalar type or a string.
Is there some rfc or work going on to enlarge the possibility so that it is
possible to have some other object like:
I don
Hi!
For now you can only index an array using a scalar type or a string.
Is there some rfc or work going on to enlarge the possibility so that it
is possible to have some other object like:
I think SplObjectStorage implements most common use-case for such
behavior, do you have any other one t
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 16:33, mathieu.suen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For now you can only index an array using a scalar type or a string.
> Is there some rfc or work going on to enlarge the possibility so that it is
> possible to have some other object like:
>
I don't think it makes sense.
You can howeve
On 6 August 2010 15:33, mathieu.suen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For now you can only index an array using a scalar type or a string.
> Is there some rfc or work going on to enlarge the possibility so that it is
> possible to have some other object like:
>
> - closure
> - object
> - etc.
>
> Thanks
>
> -- Ma
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:33:18 +0100, mathieu.suen
wrote:
Hi,
For now you can only index an array using a scalar type or a string.
Is there some rfc or work going on to enlarge the possibility so that it
is possible to have some other object like:
- closure
- object
- etc.
I think the probl
Hi,
For now you can only index an array using a scalar type or a string.
Is there some rfc or work going on to enlarge the possibility so that it
is possible to have some other object like:
- closure
- object
- etc.
Thanks
-- Mathieu Suen
11 matches
Mail list logo