On Thu, 21 Jan 2016, Flyingmana wrote:
> On 01/21/2016 09:53 PM, Ronald Chmara wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Flyingmana
> > wrote:
> >> An RFC could still be valuable for the project, even if the original
> >> author leaved, so taking it over should be possible. And it should n
Hi!
> The Goal is, to not have this argument again against someone taking over
> a withdrawn RFC. Means this should end in some rules/guidelines
> regarding RFCs. (Advice what would be needed, like for example an RFC,
> is very welcome)
I think if someone is going to abandon an RFC, it would be a
Hi,
Le 21/01/2016 21:33, Flyingmana a écrit :
As already was noted by someone else, seeing an RFC as failed if it gets
withdrawn has some serious downsides and potential to get abused.
>...
Would we need some rules in case multiple people want to take it over,
or should we say the first one w
On 01/21/2016 09:53 PM, Ronald Chmara wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Flyingmana
> wrote:
>> An RFC could still be valuable for the project, even if the original
>> author leaved, so taking it over should be possible. And it should not
>> be painful in any way.
>> Would we need some r
On 21 January 2016 at 22:24, Ronald Chmara wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Peter Lind
> wrote:
> > On 21 January 2016 at 21:53, Ronald Chmara wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Flyingmana >
> >> wrote:
> >> > Is there any way to abuse the taking over of an withdrawn RFC?
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Peter Lind wrote:
> On 21 January 2016 at 21:53, Ronald Chmara wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Flyingmana
>> wrote:
>> > Is there any way to abuse the taking over of an withdrawn RFC?
Snip_>
>> An RFC being used primarily for ongoing debate/argument/
On 21 January 2016 at 21:53, Ronald Chmara wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Flyingmana
> wrote:
> > An RFC could still be valuable for the project, even if the original
> > author leaved, so taking it over should be possible. And it should not
> > be painful in any way.
> > Would we ne
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Flyingmana wrote:
> An RFC could still be valuable for the project, even if the original
> author leaved, so taking it over should be possible. And it should not
> be painful in any way.
> Would we need some rules in case multiple people want to take it over,
> or
There seems to be some different point of views how to handle withdrawn
RFCs. As this is a separate point and maybe a more complex point I want
to start this as an additional Thread here.
The Goal is, to not have this argument again against someone taking over
a withdrawn RFC. Means this should en
