Am 16.06.2011 20:12, schrieb Stas Malyshev:
Well, we could - you could actually do it right now with list of classes
and some simple regexp-ing. The question is a value of it.
I think get_declared_classes works as well, if you create a script that
loads all your classes you could then extract
Hi!
Okay, so namespaces doesn't exists for the engine, because they are
added to the classnames in compile-time, but we could add some --rX
argument for the php binary, which would iterate over the classes and
functions and so for a given extension, and fetch and list the
introduced namespaces.
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 19:54 +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> Okay, so namespaces doesn't exists for the engine, because they are added to
> the classnames in compile-time, but we could add some --rX argument for the
> php binary, which would iterate over the classes and functions and so for a
> given
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Richard Quadling wrote:
> On 16 June 2011 17:40, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On 6/16/11 8:37 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
> >>
> >> Maybe, but because of a lack of convention on naming, we have
> namespaces.
> >
> > No, we have namespaces not because we co
On 16 June 2011 17:40, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 6/16/11 8:37 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
>>
>> Maybe, but because of a lack of convention on naming, we have namespaces.
>
> No, we have namespaces not because we couldn't agree on naming convention,
> but because any naming convention witho
Hi!
Currently, I can find the names of functions, classes and interfaces -
be they from an extension or userland code.
But I can't get namespaces, or their aliases.
Names of functions and classes _are_ namespaces. As for aliases, these
are purely compile-time concepts, so there's nothing to
Hi!
On 6/16/11 8:37 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
Maybe, but because of a lack of convention on naming, we have namespaces.
No, we have namespaces not because we couldn't agree on naming
convention, but because any naming convention without namespaces would
lead to ugly code (which you call "s
On 16 June 2011 14:03, Martin Scotta wrote:
>
> Martin Scotta
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Richard Quadling
> wrote:
>>
>> On 15 June 2011 17:23, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> >> With pecl/http (DEV-2 branch) and the Functional extension (on github)
>> >> both creating namespa
On 15 June 2011 17:23, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> With pecl/http (DEV-2 branch) and the Functional extension (on github)
>> both creating namespaces within the extension, I think there is a
>> requirement for a mechanism to allow an extension to record the
>> namespace(s) that it has, in a si
Hi!
With pecl/http (DEV-2 branch) and the Functional extension (on github)
both creating namespaces within the extension, I think there is a
requirement for a mechanism to allow an extension to record the
namespace(s) that it has, in a similar fashion to how functions and
classes are known to co
Hi.
With pecl/http (DEV-2 branch) and the Functional extension (on github)
both creating namespaces within the extension, I think there is a
requirement for a mechanism to allow an extension to record the
namespace(s) that it has, in a similar fashion to how functions and
classes are known to core
11 matches
Mail list logo
