Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I held RC2 because I thought this was a critical engine bug. It happened
because instead of not implementing NULL you implemented it without a body.
Right now I changed it to NULL which means that any clone either via
"clo
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Personally, I think we can roll RC2 with the way the tree is now. The fact
> that MySQLi isn't cloneable isn't a big deal because:
> a) It's a new PHP 5 feature which is most likely not run in
> zend.zend1_compatibility_mode
> b) If explicit "clone" isn't
At 02:09 PM 4/15/2004 -0400, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I held RC2 because I thought this was a critical engine bug. It happened
> because instead of not implementing NULL you implemented it without a body.
> Right now I changed it to NULL which me
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I held RC2 because I thought this was a critical engine bug. It happened
> because instead of not implementing NULL you implemented it without a body.
> Right now I changed it to NULL which means that any clone either via
> "clone" or compatibility_mode w
Georg,
I held RC2 because I thought this was a critical engine bug. It happened
because instead of not implementing NULL you implemented it without a body.
Right now I changed it to NULL which means that any clone either via
"clone" or compatibility_mode will result in an error message that MyS
