On Tue, Feb 18, 2025, at 20:29, Juris Evertovskis wrote:
> On 2025-02-18 19:31, Rob Landers wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2025, at 17:52, Juris Evertovskis wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> A recent discussion brought up the need for multiple constructors for the
>>> same class.
>>> https://extern
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025, at 20:24, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 2/18/25 18:31, Rob Landers wrote:
> > You may be interested in a super-draft RFC that I’ll propose in the next
> > few days…
>
> May I kindly request some breathing room with regard to new RFC
> discussions so that folks are able
On 2025-02-18 19:31, Rob Landers wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025, at 17:52, Juris Evertovskis wrote:
Hi,
A recent discussion brought up the need for multiple constructors for
the same class.
https://externals.io/message/126428
The need was mostly answered by suggestions to use factory methods
Hi
On 2/18/25 18:31, Rob Landers wrote:
You may be interested in a super-draft RFC that I’ll propose in the next few
days…
May I kindly request some breathing room with regard to new RFC
discussions so that folks are able to give each RFC the proper
attention. The list currently is super ac
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025, at 17:52, Juris Evertovskis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A recent discussion brought up the need for multiple constructors for the
> same class.
> https://externals.io/message/126428
>
> The need was mostly answered by suggestions to use factory methods.
> However on an earlier dis
Hi,
A recent discussion brought up the need for multiple constructors for the
same class.
https://externals.io/message/126428
The need was mostly answered by suggestions to use factory methods.
However on an earlier discussion it was discussed how it's fine and even
useful for constructor
