Hello Markus,
the question alone makes me question if it was worth the effort starting
it :-)
best regards
marcus
Friday, May 19, 2006, 11:23:32 PM, you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Is there an "UPGRADING 5.1 to 5.2"? I think there it would make sense, too.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there an "UPGRADING 5.1 to 5.2"? I think there it would make sense, too.
- - Markus
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> I'll add a note about it to the 5.2 README file.
>
>
> On 19-May-06, at 11:00 AM, Brian Moon wrote:
>
>> Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>>> S
Cool. I just had a horrible vision of hundreds of reports of 'strange
crashes' :)
When E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR is triggers and not handled, it gets translated
to an E_ERROR "Catchable fatal error...".
On 19-May-06, at 12:10 PM, Steph Fox wrote:
Back to my original (off-list) question - what h
When E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR is triggers and not handled, it gets
translated to an E_ERROR "Catchable fatal error...".
On 19-May-06, at 12:10 PM, Steph Fox wrote:
Back to my original (off-list) question - what happens if people
don't have E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR level error reporting switched on?
Back to my original (off-list) question - what happens if people don't have
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR level error reporting switched on? Does it fall back to
E_ERROR or does the code fail silently?
I'll add a note about it to the 5.2 README file.
On 19-May-06, at 11:00 AM, Brian Moon wrote:
Ili
I'll add a note about it to the 5.2 README file.
On 19-May-06, at 11:00 AM, Brian Moon wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
So the only affect is that value numeric value of E_ALL is greater
then it was before. Marcus has already applied patch to this
affect a few days ago (Thanks!).
This need
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
So the only affect is that value numeric value of E_ALL is greater then
it was before. Marcus has already applied patch to this affect a few
days ago (Thanks!).
This needs to be made obvious in the release notes or something. Users
that set their error level in apache
I'd like to thank everyone for voting on the topic and making their
opinions known. The conclusion is that:
E_STRICT will not be a part of E_ALL, however E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR
will be, this means no "new" errors will appear for current user, as
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR is similar to what E_ERROR w
At 12:23 17/05/2006, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 02:26 17/05/2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into
Hello Richard,
well my mail was a bit out of context or at the wrong reply to Sebastian.
He was talking about issues with callin static functions with bypassing
$this as a parameter
best regards
marcus
Friday, May 19, 2006, 12:22:36 AM, you wrote:
>>> Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Addit
>> Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {}
foo::$bar = 1;
On Wed, May 17, 2006 2:03 pm, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> there is a technical issue besides slowdown. We have to work around
> the
> fact that suddenly a function might get $this as a nor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, May 16, 2006 6:26 pm, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
I'd say E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR has to go into E_ALL as it was effectively
there previously, as part of E_ERROR. So +1 there.
As far as E
On Tue, May 16, 2006 6:26 pm, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-0.5
> Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar =
> 1;
+1
--
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing
On 5/17/06, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
+1 for E_RECOVERABLE_
Hello Sebastian,
there is a technical issue besides slowdown. We have to work around the
fact that suddenly a function might get $this as a normal variable (remember
the examples give on this list included that). Right now $this is handled by
a special zval not stored in the local or global symo
At 04:26 PM 5/16/2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
Addition of support for dynamic st
> There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and
> forth flaming going around and we need to finally come to a
> decision about.
>
> The two topics are:
>
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
> Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {}
> fo
On 17-May-06, at 2:10 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
I do
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR's apparently going in anyway.
E_STRICT, I'd be all for including into E_ALL now if it weren't for the
'semi-statics' issue (complex) and the dist
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
I am not glad with E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR at all, but if it went into 5.2 it
should be included into E_ALL, becouse in most cases it substitute E_ERROR
messages.
E_STRICT +0
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR +1
> Addition of support for dynamic statics
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-1
> Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
-1
--
Etienne Kneuss
http://www.colder.ch/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe,
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-1
Changing the behavior of error reporting can have some implications on
servers where it is intended to not show errors at least with E_STRICT
errors.
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {}
At 02:26 17/05/2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-1
Addition of support for dynam
Am Mi, den 17.05.2006 schrieb Ilia Alshanetsky um 1:26:
-1 for E_STRICT in 5.x
/Georg
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>> Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
>
> -1
Apparently I had the wrong context when I read a posting by Marcus on
technical issues (slowdown).
If there are no technical issues with implementing this, then I am -0
on this.
--
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 02:26, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
> flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
>
> The two topics are:
>
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
+1
> Addition o
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
+0
> Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
-1
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E
On 17.05.2006 03:26, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
E_RECOVERABLE should stay.
E_STR
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
I don't like E_ALL & ~E_NOTICE suddenly starting to th
On 17.5.2006 1:26 Uhr, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
> flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
>
> The two topics are:
>
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-1, especially for in
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
+1
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
-1
--
Brian Moon
-
http://dealnews.com/
Its good to be cheap =)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: h
On Tue, 16 May 2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth flaming
> going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
>
> The two topics are:
>
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR shou
On 5/16/06, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-1
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
-1.
--Wez.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.p
-1 on both here, E_STRICT can wait and dynamic static variables are
pretty pointless, the workaround is clearer than the kludge..
StaticClass::$options['somekey'] = 'value';
Regards
Alan
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going
On 16-May-06, at 7:50 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Ilia,
Wednesday, May 17, 2006, 1:26:37 AM, you wrote:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
+1
While doing all the stuff we wanted for 5.2 we also added
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR. This includes stuff that was E_ERROR before
Hello Ilia,
second try of second part this time using static. I guess i need sleep.
Wednesday, May 17, 2006, 1:26:37 AM, you wrote:
> Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
-1
If we go that road i suggest we simply drop support for STATIC. Fixing
the issues
Hello Ilia,
Wednesday, May 17, 2006, 1:26:37 AM, you wrote:
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
+1
I gave my best on this. But be sure. I'll just ignore any whining on
any change that has a E_STRICT in older versions when doing changes
in any version after 5.2.
Also befor
So, would that make it - non cents?
...sorry, couldn't resist
-D
On May 16, 2006, at 5:26 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
So please throw in your +1/-1
Darrell Brogdon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://darrell.brogdon.net
http://phpflashcards.com
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-1
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
+1
Edin
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
So ple
40 matches
Mail list logo
