On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently noticed that on http://www.php.net/downloads.php,
> "Redhat/CentOS Binaries" link to a third party repository [1].
>
> First, this could be confused for users, as this is not a Red Hat or
> CentOS official repository.
None o
Lester Caine wrote:
Checked distrowatch?
I had stopped checking distrowatch some years ago, mainly because I was happy
with the 'base' (SUSE) but also because at that time there was a lot 'missing'
from the listings. But I've found the 'All tracked packages' now ...
I've been having an in d
2012.09.16. 4:36, "Lester Caine" ezt írta:
>
> David Muir wrote:
>>>
>>> Remi Collet wrote:
>>
>> >>> >Last night I spent a couple of hours again trying to find an
'off the
>> >>> >shelf' distribution that even had PHP5.4 and Apache2.4 ...
>>Fedora 18 have httpd 2.4.3 and php
David Muir wrote:
Remi Collet wrote:
>>> >Last night I spent a couple of hours again trying to find an 'off the
>>> >shelf' distribution that even had PHP5.4 and Apache2.4 ...
>>Fedora 18 have httpd 2.4.3 and php 5.4.7;)
>>(I have backports for f17)
>18 is downloading at the moment, but I coul
On 15/09/2012, at 8:38 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Remi Collet wrote:
>>> >Last night I spent a couple of hours again trying to find an 'off the
>>> >shelf' distribution that even had PHP5.4 and Apache2.4 ...
>> Fedora 18 have httpd 2.4.3 and php 5.4.7;)
>> (I have backports for f17)
> 18 is downl
Remi Collet wrote:
>Last night I spent a couple of hours again trying to find an 'off the
>shelf' distribution that even had PHP5.4 and Apache2.4 ...
Fedora 18 have httpd 2.4.3 and php 5.4.7;)
(I have backports for f17)
18 is downloading at the moment, but I could not find on the Fedora site any
Le 15/09/2012 11:09, Lester Caine a écrit :
> Last night I spent a couple of hours again trying to find an 'off the
> shelf' distribution that even had PHP5.4 and Apache2.4 ...
Fedora 18 have httpd 2.4.3 and php 5.4.7 ;)
(I have backports for f17)
> With reference to your own repository Remi -
>
>
> But also (and mainly) because this is a confusing "link".
>
>
Perhaps this link will clarify the situation for you: http://xkcd.com/175/
--Kris
Le 15/09/2012 10:58, Ferenc Kovacs a écrit :
> http://git.php.net/?p=web/php.git;a=commit;h=6d85653df2e1cb2c97003f0c42000f2129f976e1
> It seems somebody mailed the webmaster list and Hannes added them to
> that page.
> They are there because they provided up-to-date packages for redhat/centos.
> Y
Remi Collet wrote:
I recently noticed that onhttp://www.php.net/downloads.php,
"Redhat/CentOS Binaries" link to a third party repository [1].
First, this could be confused for users, as this is not a Red Hat or
CentOS official repository.
Why PHP project (seems to) recommend the use of a third
2012.09.15. 9:47, "Remi Collet" ezt írta:
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently noticed that on http://www.php.net/downloads.php,
> "Redhat/CentOS Binaries" link to a third party repository [1].
>
> First, this could be confused for users, as this is not a Red Hat or
> CentOS official repository.
>
> Why PHP pro
Hi,
I recently noticed that on http://www.php.net/downloads.php,
"Redhat/CentOS Binaries" link to a third party repository [1].
First, this could be confused for users, as this is not a Red Hat or
CentOS official repository.
Why PHP project (seems to) recommend the use of a third party repositor
12 matches
Mail list logo
