I don't want to prove nothing, just thinking if is possible optimize empty
methods to be faster than method_exists().
Em 10 de mar de 2018 1:11 AM, "CHU Zhaowei" escreveu:
> What are you trying to prove? We all know method call is expensive. So
> definitely it will be slower when you make more c
What are you trying to prove? We all know method call is expensive. So
definitely it will be slower when you make more calls.
Best regards,
CHU Zhaowei
Case #1: https://pastebin.com/cT0gWuNH
Case #2: https://pastebin.com/724v9rBZ
Case #3: https://pastebin.com/9zXpztCc
Case #4: https://pastebin.com/q87p9S4r
2018-03-08 14:52 GMT-03:00 Nikita Popov :
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:41 PM, David Rodrigues
> wrote:
>
>> I have take note that a lot of pro
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:41 PM, David Rodrigues
wrote:
> I have take note that a lot of projects (like Laravel) prefer uses
> method_exists() than implements an empty function (that should be useful to
> IDE when it is not annotated as an @method on class).
>
> For some reason, method_exists() wi
I have take note that a lot of projects (like Laravel) prefer uses
method_exists() than implements an empty function (that should be useful to
IDE when it is not annotated as an @method on class).
For some reason, method_exists() will works faster than direct call when
method doesn't exists vs. a
