Am 26.08.2012 01:57, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
> So you are saying that your (teams) IDE doesn't tell you the method
> signature which contains also the default values?
> I guess that the fact that many of the php core functions have
optional
> arguments and non null default
>
>
> > So you are saying that your (teams) IDE doesn't tell you the method
> > signature which contains also the default values?
> > I guess that the fact that many of the php core functions have optional
> > arguments and non null defaults must be really a PITA for you.
>
> I think what he was al
On 26/08/2012, at 4:09 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> 2012.08.25. 19:50, "Sebastian Krebs" ezt írta:
>>
>> Am 25.08.2012 18:38, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
>>
>>>
>>>would this trigger a notice if $foo is not defined?
>>>if yes, then it would be different from the current behavior of
2012.08.25. 19:50, "Sebastian Krebs" ezt írta:
>
> Am 25.08.2012 18:38, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
>
>>
>> would this trigger a notice if $foo is not defined?
>> if yes, then it would be different from the current behavior of
the
>> ternary operator.
>>
>>
>> Couldn't belie
Am 25.08.2012 18:38, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
would this trigger a notice if $foo is not defined?
if yes, then it would be different from the current behavior of the
ternary operator.
Couldn't believe it, thus I tested it myself
snip
Don't know, what you are ta
>
>
>> would this trigger a notice if $foo is not defined?
>> if yes, then it would be different from the current behavior of the
>> ternary operator.
>>
>
> Couldn't believe it, thus I tested it myself
>
snip
> Don't know, what you are talking about, but the notice _is_ the current
> behaiour a
Am 24.08.2012 23:11, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Sebastian Krebs mailto:krebs@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must
implement it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the
operators the
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must
> implement it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the operators the
> short ternary operator should be usable in conjunction with the assignment
> like t
Am 19.08.2012 00:20, schrieb Andrew Faulds:
On 18/08/12 03:36, Tjerk Meesters wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On 18 Aug, 2012, at 5:41 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
Hi,
Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must
implement it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the
On 18/08/12 03:36, Tjerk Meesters wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On 18 Aug, 2012, at 5:41 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
Hi,
Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must implement
it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the operators the short ternary
operator shoul
Sent from my iPhone
On 18 Aug, 2012, at 5:41 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must implement
> it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the operators the short
> ternary operator should be usable in conjunction with t
On 17/08/12 23:41, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must
> implement it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the
> operators the short ternary operator should be usable in conjunction
> with the assignment like the other binary
Hi,
Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must
implement it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the operators
the short ternary operator should be usable in conjunction with the
assignment like the other binary operators. Don't know, if anybody
understands me
13 matches
Mail list logo
