On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:57:47 +0100, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 14:38 +0100, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
I've updated the wiki page for "Closures with objects extension" with
things that are in "Proposal A with modification"s but are not
implemented:
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/c
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:37:01 +0100, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 15:29 +0100, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
> * What about allowing properties with function names as
strings or
> array($obj_or_class, 'method'), won't that be needed for
being
> consistent with
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:37:01 +0100, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 15:29 +0100, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
> * What about allowing properties with function names as
strings or
> array($obj_or_class, 'method'), won't that be needed for
being
> consistent with
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 15:29 +0100, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
>
> > * What about allowing properties with function names as
> strings or
> > array($obj_or_class, 'method'), won't that be needed for
> being
> > consistent with local variables?
>
> Well, you cannot do "$a = 'phpinfo
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:57:47 +0100, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 14:38 +0100, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
I've updated the wiki page for "Closures with objects extension" with
things that are in "Proposal A with modification"s but are not
implemented:
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/c
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 14:38 +0100, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
> I've updated the wiki page for "Closures with objects extension" with
> things that are in "Proposal A with modification"s but are not implemented:
>
> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/closures/object-extension#status_as_of_august_10_2010
>
> I p
I've updated the wiki page for "Closures with objects extension" with
things that are in "Proposal A with modification"s but are not implemented:
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/closures/object-extension#status_as_of_august_10_2010
I propose an implementation of "closures stored in properties used as
