>
>
>> So it's mostly a syntactic sugar that allows defining an interface for
> the current class that is already implemented by the current class.
>
Yeah, while answering to you, I've actually came to the same conclusion.
>
> The interface name is the same as the class name and based on the con
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 7:53 AM someniatko wrote:
> We want to write some tests for the Service class, but we don't want
> to use a real SomeDependency instance
> during tests. A common approach is to either extract an interface
> (JUST to make it testable), or to drop the
> `final` keyword and a
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 3:30 PM someniatko wrote:
> > This sounds interesting but it breaks some expectations.
> >
> > Interesting because you can have any class act as an interface for other
> classes with the interface being built up of any public properties or
> method that exists on that clas
> This sounds interesting but it breaks some expectations.
>
> Interesting because you can have any class act as an interface for other
> classes with the interface being built up of any public properties or method
> that exists on that class.
In my original suggestion, it's not like any class,
> On 21 Feb 2023, at 18:52, someniatko wrote:
>
> Hi again, internals
>
> My marathon of some crazy ideas continues :D, with less crazy one this time.
>
>
> ## Idea
>
> Allow "reimplementing" the non-static public API (that is public
> properties and methods, excluding constructor) of a cl
Hi Someniatko,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 1:52 PM someniatko wrote:
> Hi again, internals
>
> My marathon of some crazy ideas continues :D, with less crazy one this
> time.
>
>
> ## Idea
>
> Allow "reimplementing" the non-static public API (that is public
> properties and methods, excluding constru
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 12:52 PM someniatko wrote:
>
> Hi again, internals
>
> My marathon of some crazy ideas continues :D, with less crazy one this time.
>
>
> ## Idea
>
> Allow "reimplementing" the non-static public API (that is public
> properties and methods, excluding constructor) of a class
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023, 8:52 AM someniatko wrote:
> Hi again, internals
>
> My marathon of some crazy ideas continues :D, with less crazy one this
> time.
>
>
> ## Idea
>
> Allow "reimplementing" the non-static public API (that is public
> properties and methods, excluding constructor) of a class b
Hi again, internals
My marathon of some crazy ideas continues :D, with less crazy one this time.
## Idea
Allow "reimplementing" the non-static public API (that is public
properties and methods, excluding constructor) of a class by other
classes like this:
```php
final class interface A {
p
