On Thu, 19 Dec 2019, 21:17 Rowan Tommins, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Earlier, I was writing an application-specific wrapper around the
> password_hash function, and was surprised that it could return false,
> rather than throwing an error.
>
> I then found this commit to master making it throw errors f
Hi all,
Earlier, I was writing an application-specific wrapper around the
password_hash function, and was surprised that it could return false,
rather than throwing an error.
I then found this commit to master making it throw errors for PHP 8.0:
https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/37c11714
Zitat von Pierre Joye :
2010/5/29 Johannes Schlüter :
Hey,
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 23:50 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
I'd to add that unless we add everything in the NEWS file, the
ChangeLog remains the only way to have a list of all changes (without
doing manually).
Having the file is absolutel
Hey,
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 23:50 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
> I'd to add that unless we add everything in the NEWS file, the
> ChangeLog remains the only way to have a list of all changes (without
> doing manually).
Having the file is absolutely fine with me, while I can fulfill my needs
with svn
2010/5/29 Johannes Schlüter :
> Hey,
>
> On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 23:50 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> I'd to add that unless we add everything in the NEWS file, the
>> ChangeLog remains the only way to have a list of all changes (without
>> doing manually).
>
> Having the file is absolutely fine with m
hi Gwynne,
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Gwynne Raskind
wrote:
>> By "without doing it manually", I meant when one fetches a release or
>> a snapshot.
>
>
> The ChangeLog files aren't updated because no one ever ported the ChangeLog
> crons from CVS to SVN. It wouldn't be very difficult - i
On May 28, 2010, at 7:43 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
Is anybody using this file? If this is thee case could somebody then
make sure it's being updated (and maybe take care of
ChangeLog-200[6-9].gz being created) else I'd suggest dropping them. An
outdated file might be confusing for
2010/5/29 Derick Rethans :
> On Fri, 28 May 2010, Pierre Joye wrote:
>
>> 2010/5/28 Johannes Schlüter :
>>
>> > Is anybody using this file? If this is thee case could somebody then
>> > make sure it's being updated (and maybe take care of
>> > ChangeLog-200[6-9].gz being created) else I'd suggest d
On Fri, 28 May 2010, Pierre Joye wrote:
> 2010/5/28 Johannes Schlüter :
>
> > Is anybody using this file? If this is thee case could somebody then
> > make sure it's being updated (and maybe take care of
> > ChangeLog-200[6-9].gz being created) else I'd suggest dropping them. An
> > outdated file
hi Johannes,
2010/5/28 Johannes Schlüter :
> Is anybody using this file? If this is thee case could somebody then
> make sure it's being updated (and maybe take care of
> ChangeLog-200[6-9].gz being created) else I'd suggest dropping them. An
> outdated file might be confusing for users expecting
2010/5/28 Johannes Schlüter :
> Is anybody using this file? If this is thee case could somebody then
> make sure it's being updated (and maybe take care of
> ChangeLog-200[6-9].gz being created) else I'd suggest dropping them. An
> outdated file might be confusing for users expecting content like w
2010/5/28 Johannes Schlüter :
> Hey,
>
> I know type hints are more fun to discuss but anyways: In trunk
> ChangeLog lists entries up till 2005 (when 5.2 was branched of, from
> which 5.3 was branched from which the current trunk was branched of) In
> the old trunk the file lasts until 2009-07-08 (
Hey,
I know type hints are more fun to discuss but anyways: In trunk
ChangeLog lists entries up till 2005 (when 5.2 was branched of, from
which 5.3 was branched from which the current trunk was branched of) In
the old trunk the file lasts until 2009-07-08 (when we switched from CVS
to svn)
Is any
13 matches
Mail list logo
