Very strange. We do a GetLongPathName() in virtual_file_ex() which opens
the file. Can you see if it's reach that piece of code?
Andi
At 02:55 PM 7/19/2004 +0200, Michele Locati wrote:
There's another thing you should note: under Windows it is possible to
specify file names in two ways: in the e
- Original Message -
From: "Stanislav Malyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michele Locati" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Case sensitivity of require_once
> ML>>There&#x
I think we're already using it in TSRM in PHP 5, which is why I asked
for someone to confirm it there.
--Wez.
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:55:58 +0300 (IDT), Stanislav Malyshev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ML>>There's another thing you should note: under Windows it is possible to
> ML>>specify file nam
ML>>There's another thing you should note: under Windows it is possible to
ML>>specify file names in two ways: in the expanded (normal) way, and in a
ML>>short way (8.3 file naming compatible).
I think there's a function in Win32 API which brings all these forms to
common base.
--
Stanislav Ma
There's another thing you should note: under Windows it is possible to specify file
names in two ways: in the expanded (normal) way, and in a short way (8.3 file naming
compatible).
For example:
C:\Program Files\SomeFileName.ext
could be specified also as
C:\PROGRA~1\SOMEFI~1.EX
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:45:12 +0200
Jakub Vrana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wez Furlong wrote:
> > Did you test require_once under PHP 5 yet?
> > (without your patch)
> This behavior is PHP 4 specific.
>
> Antony Dovgal wrote:
> > http://lists.php.net/php.doc/969361918
> The problem is not that t
Wez Furlong wrote:
> Did you test require_once under PHP 5 yet?
> (without your patch)
This behavior is PHP 4 specific.
Antony Dovgal wrote:
> http://lists.php.net/php.doc/969361918
The problem is not that the file isn't included at all. The problem is
that the file is included twice.
Jakub Vrana
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:12:58 +0100
Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you test require_once under PHP 5 yet?
> (without your patch)
Yep.
http://lists.php.net/php.doc/969361918
---
WBR,
Antony Dovgal aka tony2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime De
Did you test require_once under PHP 5 yet?
(without your patch)
--Wez.
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:56:02 +0200, Jakub Vrana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> File a.php is required twice with this code on Windows:
> require_once "a.php";
> require_once "A.php";
> ?>
>
> Should I document this behavior or
File a.php is required twice with this code on Windows:
Should I document this behavior or should patch similar to this be
applied?
Index: zend_execute.c
===
RCS file: /repository/Zend/Attic/zend_execute.c,v
retrieving revision 1.31
10 matches
Mail list logo
