On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi Laruence,
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Laruence wrote:
>> Hi:
>> Call for voting for "Allow use T_AS in closure use statement",
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/useas#voting
>>
>> any comment will be appreciated.
>
> Well, that's
hi Laruence,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Laruence wrote:
> Hi:
> Call for voting for "Allow use T_AS in closure use statement",
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/useas#voting
>
> any comment will be appreciated.
Well, that's why the discussions period is required.
Please close the vote, b
Hi!
> For starters, maybe we could use a few examples from the previous thread
> about this
> rfc: http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg57855.html
> I really liked the one example from Jordi
> (http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg57904.html)
This is exactly th
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Call for voting for "Allow use T_AS in closure use statement",
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/useas#voting
> >
> > any comment will be appreciated.
>
> I think it would be useful to add some explanation why this change is
> us
Hi!
> Call for voting for "Allow use T_AS in closure use statement",
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/useas#voting
>
> any comment will be appreciated.
I think it would be useful to add some explanation why this change is
useful, with specific code examples that it improves. Right now it seems
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Sara Golemon wrote:
> Did the voting close already? One day seems awfully short. :(
Laruence closed the vote because he wanted to add aliasing of
arbitrary expressions instead of just variables.
Nikita
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
Did the voting close already? One day seems awfully short. :(
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Laruence wrote:
> Hi:
> Call for voting for "Allow use T_AS in closure use statement",
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/useas#voting
>
> any comment will be appreciated.
>
> thanks
>
> --
> Laruence
On 18/07/12 17:19, Leigh wrote:
I missed the discussion on this one, the RFC examples are very simple. Does
it support aliasing array indices?
I have missed the discussion two.
I can't vote but I don't feel confortable with this new notation.
Wouldn't be better to make the “=” operator availab
Laruence,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Laruence wrote:
> Hi:
> I saw you two vote against for this RFC.
>
> could you explain why? then maybe I can improve it.
>
> thanks
The reason that I voted against it is simple. It's sugar to make it harder
to understand what the code is doin
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Laruence wrote:
> Hi:
> I saw you two vote against for this RFC.
>
> could you explain why? then maybe I can improve it.
>
> thanks
>
>
I can't speak for them, but it might have something to do with a lack of
information. I don't recall seeing the discus
Hi:
I saw you two vote against for this RFC.
could you explain why? then maybe I can improve it.
thanks
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Laruence wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Leigh wrote:
>> I missed the discussion on this one, the RFC examples are very simple. Does
>>
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Leigh wrote:
> I missed the discussion on this one, the RFC examples are very simple. Does
> it support aliasing array indices?
>
> For example: (use $matches[0] as $name)
sorry, no, it's only support literal variable for now.
thanks
>
> On Jul 18, 2012 3:55 PM,
I missed the discussion on this one, the RFC examples are very simple. Does
it support aliasing array indices?
For example: (use $matches[0] as $name)
On Jul 18, 2012 3:55 PM, "Laruence" wrote:
> Hi:
> Call for voting for "Allow use T_AS in closure use statement",
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/
Hi:
Call for voting for "Allow use T_AS in closure use statement",
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/useas#voting
any comment will be appreciated.
thanks
--
Laruence Xinchen Hui
http://www.laruence.com/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.
14 matches
Mail list logo
