Hi!
> I don't understand the reasoning why it requires RFC nor Merge
> approval. As we all know, there are many bug fixes without RFC nor
> discussion.
If the fix is uncontroversial (everybody agrees), no RFC/approval is
needed, since there already is approval, since nobody objects, which is
by d
Hi Pierre,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> Like your session change, while not really critical to me (has been
> like that for ages) is relatively logical while as a RM, I would not
It's off topic, but I'll paste answer to a question regarding
session.use_strict_mode. i.e.
hi Yasuo,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following commit is reverted because someone requested "RFC" and/or
> demand "Merge approval from RM",
Yes, this is the rule for non obvious things. Or no matter what for
stable branches in security mode or RC phase.
>
Hi all,
Following commit is reverted because someone requested "RFC" and/or
demand "Merge approval from RM",
http://git.php.net/?p=php-src.git;a=commitdiff;h=48f1a17886d874dc90867c669481804de90509e8
I don't understand the reasoning why it requires RFC nor Merge
approval. As we all know, there ar
