Is there any reason why the function can't be added in the interim before a
patch is ready?
Or is there a global consensus that the new functionality should be
available under the existing function?
Matt
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Lars Strojny wrote:
> Any news?
>
> Am 04.01.2013 um 13:
Any news?
Am 04.01.2013 um 13:45 schrieb Pierre Joye :
> No need to create another function for that. I will do it once I am back at
> work next week.
> On Jan 3, 2013 12:33 PM, "Lars Strojny" wrote:
>
>> No objection from my POV. Going to merge it in around a week, if no one
>> objects.
>>
>>
No need to create another function for that. I will do it once I am back at
work next week.
On Jan 3, 2013 12:33 PM, "Lars Strojny" wrote:
> No objection from my POV. Going to merge it in around a week, if no one
> objects.
>
> Am 02.01.2013 um 10:35 schrieb matt clegg :
>
> > I have added ImageC
No objection from my POV. Going to merge it in around a week, if no one objects.
Am 02.01.2013 um 10:35 schrieb matt clegg :
> I have added ImageCopyMergeAlpha as an extra function to resolve bug 23815.
>
> I have created a pull request on github
> https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/211
>
> Ca
I have added ImageCopyMergeAlpha as an extra function to resolve bug 23815.
I have created a pull request on github
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/211
Can this be merged into 5.5? And, what do I need to do?
--
Matt Clegg
--http://mattclegg.com/
