On 3/24/07, Michael B Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 10:32:41 +0500
"Back Ports" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ldap_sasl_auth() doesn't support gssapi either, though my earlier post
> to this list ended up on a web site somewhere with a note saying
> 'theoretically it's poss
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 10:32:41 +0500
"Back Ports" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ldap_sasl_auth() doesn't support gssapi either, though my earlier post
> to this list ended up on a web site somewhere with a note saying
> 'theoretically it's possible'.
Not true. The ldap_sasl_bind function does in-fac
Mike,
Thanks for your reply.
On 3/23/07, Michael B Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:02:50 +0500
"Back Ports" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there any progress on the following bug report:
>
> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33500&thanks=6
>
> It was reported
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:02:50 +0500
"Back Ports" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there any progress on the following bug report:
>
> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33500&thanks=6
>
> It was reported quite a while ago -- I also saw a relevant post on the
> mit kerberos mailing list wh
Hi all,
Is there any progress on the following bug report:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33500&thanks=6
It was reported quite a while ago -- I also saw a relevant post on the
mit kerberos mailing list where discussed patches fixed the issue,
however, they appear impossible to track down.
http
