David Zülke writes:
> I don't care about the thousands of idiots out there who are too
> dumb to avoid security leaks.
You don't have to be very dumb to create a whopping big security hole.
It should be *hard* to create a security lapse which causes hostile
code to run on your server. 'include
I can't say I'm quite sure why anyone is continuing to argue against
something that's already been denied, especially in a thread about
ending the argument.
David Zülke wrote:
Fookin' Jaysus man.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.
, and it did nothing but waste helluva lot of bandwidth.
- David
> -Original Message-
> From: Russell Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 7:15 AM
> To: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] Bringing the 'include' discussion to an end
>
Russell Nelson wrote:
Okay, I'm leaving for vacation in 7 hours. I'd like to bring the
'include' discussion to an end. There have been a lot of weak points
made...
Russell, no offense, but the developers, and many random other people
have attempted to stop this conversation many times. Thi
Okay, I'm leaving for vacation in 7 hours. I'd like to bring the
'include' discussion to an end. There have been a lot of weak points
made, e.g. "Yeah, it's a problem; that's why we documented it".
Rather than re-dismiss them, I'll ignore them in favor of addressing
the strongest ones.
o This
