On 2004-09-26 03:05:18 +0200, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
I'll see which parts of your patch can be adapted for 5.1.x. I think
the var lookup is probably the most substantial one but I will probably
implement it slightly different. I'll mail internals@ when I have
something.
this need
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Benchmark of new VM
Hi Thies,
I'll see which parts of your patch can be adapted for 5.1.x. I think the
var lookup is probably the most substantial one but I will probably
implement it slightly different. I'll mail internals@ when I have something.
As I mailed you, I tr
Seems my attachments are getting filtered out. Try #2.
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:05:18 -0700
To: Thies C. Arntzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Benchmark of new VM
Hi Thies,
I'll see which parts of your patch c
The script gets nuked when buildconf is run (since it matches *.php in
the .cvsignore file).
Not sure how to fix that :-)
--Wez.
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:42:48 -0700, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> bench.php script I commited to php5/Zend/tests.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Developme
Hi Thies,
I'll see which parts of your patch can be adapted for 5.1.x. I think the
var lookup is probably the most substantial one but I will probably
implement it slightly different. I'll mail internals@ when I have something.
As I mailed you, I tried the zval_copy_ctor() and zval_dtor() optimiz
On 2004-09-24 01:42:48 +0200, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Hi,
Take it at face value but I get the following results with the new VM
vs. 5.0.x on the bench.php script I commited to php5/Zend/tests.
PHP 5.0.xPHP 5.1.x
37.5secsvs 29secs
You know I'm not a big believer in syn
Hi,
Take it at face value but I get the following results with the new VM vs.
5.0.x on the bench.php script I commited to php5/Zend/tests.
PHP 5.0.xPHP 5.1.x
37.5secsvs 29secs
You know I'm not a big believer in synthetic benchmarks but it's still
quite nice.
Andi
--
PHP Internals
