On Apr 11 12:08:15, Todd Ruth wrote:
> I'm not arguing whether the following code fragment is good
> or bad (it's certainly less than ideal), but given the recent
> threads, I thought I'd show how I feel I've been encourage by
> php to code:
>
> $x = array();
> $y = 'something';
> $temp =& $x[$
On Apr 11 14:14:40, Matt Wilson wrote:
> Something I've been doing for a long time is similar, but in my opinion a
> much better practice.
>
> function coalesce(&$val, $ifnull = false)
> {
> return empty($val) ? $ifnull : $val;
> }
>
> Add whatever restrictive logic you wish here, if empty
Something I've been doing for a long time is similar, but in my opinion a much
better practice.
function coalesce(&$val, $ifnull = false)
{
return empty($val) ? $ifnull : $val;
}
Add whatever restrictive logic you wish here, if empty() isn't good enough for
your purposes.
$_GET['might
I'm not arguing whether the following code fragment is good
or bad (it's certainly less than ideal), but given the recent
threads, I thought I'd show how I feel I've been encourage by
php to code:
I'm not sure where (if anywhere) that technique is documented
or even if it should be documented,
