[PHP-DEV] apache2 buckets API masters needed

2018-07-16 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
Hi! I need help from somebody who knows how to deal with the details of Apache2 bucket brigade API for some issue in Apache2 SAPI. I suspect there's a bug there that can lead to serious problems in certain situations but not sure how to fix it because my knowledge of proper ways to handle Apache2

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2 patch sanity check

2005-07-14 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > This patch ... Ah, crap, an unrelated sapi_get_request_time backport patch snuck in there. Here is the clean patch. Index: sapi_apache2.c === RCS file: /repository/php-src/sapi/apache2handler/sapi_apache2.c,

[PHP-DEV] Apache2 patch sanity check

2005-07-14 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
This patch is to fix http://bugs.php.net/33690 which is caused by the fact that php_handler() in sapi/apache2handler/sapi_apache.c calls apply_config() well before it has allocated SG(server_context) and set ctx->r to the current request_rec. Downstream from that any ini handler that needs somethi

Re: [PHP-DEV] apache2 sapi uninitialized content-length value

2004-02-05 Thread Doru Petrescu
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 14:27, Jani Taskinen wrote: > I don't remember seeing any patch..nor do I see one now.. > And what exactly is the problem you see that the patch fixes? Here it is again ... Is there a problem with the archive from 20 Nov 2003 ?!?!? > On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Doru Pe

Re: [PHP-DEV] apache2 sapi uninitialized content-length value

2004-02-05 Thread Jani Taskinen
I don't remember seeing any patch..nor do I see one now.. And what exactly is the problem you see that the patch fixes? --Jani On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Doru Petrescu wrote: > > >Hi, > >some time ago I sent a patch to fix this uninitialized variable in the >apache2 sapi code. all

[PHP-DEV] apache2 sapi uninitialized content-length value

2004-02-05 Thread Doru Petrescu
Hi, some time ago I sent a patch to fix this uninitialized variable in the apache2 sapi code. all other SAPIs DO initialize it, so I figured out it is something that should be corrected. I see neither php-5.0.0B3 nor php-4.3.5RC2 implement this. Can someone comment on this ? Was my 2 line pat

Re: [PHP-DEV] apache2 sapis and conf handling

2004-01-29 Thread Ilia Alshanetsky
On January 29, 2004 01:01 am, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > Right, that was what I was verifying. I couldn't see any place where a > reset was done at all, so I thought maybe it was hidden away somewhere. > Looks like we need to fix that. I'll have a look at it tomorrow. Already done :). Ilia -- PH

Re: [PHP-DEV] apache2 sapis and conf handling

2004-01-28 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Sascha Schumann wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > > Sascha, not sure if you followed the discussion regarding the conf > > Apparently, the apache2 sapis don't call zend_ini_deactivate > at all. The current configuration is activated using > a

Re: [PHP-DEV] apache2 sapis and conf handling

2004-01-28 Thread Sascha Schumann
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > Sascha, not sure if you followed the discussion regarding the conf Apparently, the apache2 sapis don't call zend_ini_deactivate at all. The current configuration is activated using apply_config(), but we don't attempt to reset it. So,

[PHP-DEV] apache2 sapis and conf handling

2004-01-28 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Sascha, not sure if you followed the discussion regarding the conf settings bleeding from one request to the next in the apache1 sapis. We finally tracked it down to a forgotten zend_ini_deactivate() call in the xbithack handler. There are some reports that this is also a problem under Apache

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2

2003-08-11 Thread Cristiano Duarte
Despite all warning and the EXPERIMENTAL label, I'm using Apache2 on production since last year. IMHO, the new features available (filter modules) and the complete rewrite of some parts made Apache2 very attractive and faster (YMMV). I implemented UFU (User Friendly URLs) in apache (httpd.conf) usi

[PHP-DEV] Apache2

2003-08-11 Thread Marc Richards
I know that Apache 2 discussions have come up before, so I will make my question very specific. Given that pre-fork is the default Apache mpm on linux systems, why doesn't PHP have non-experimental support for Apache 2 when using this module? I realize that there are thread-saftey issues when usi

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2

2003-08-10 Thread Cristiano Duarte
"Ilia Alshanetsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu na mensagem news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I wouldn't worry about the EXPERIMENTAL label, but rather whether the PHP's > Apache 2 interface works for you and if there are any bug reports that may > affect you. Personally, I do not yet see a reason to switch

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2

2003-08-09 Thread Ilia Alshanetsky
I wouldn't worry about the EXPERIMENTAL label, but rather whether the PHP's Apache 2 interface works for you and if there are any bug reports that may affect you. Personally, I do not yet see a reason to switch to Apache 2 from Apache 1, but that's just me. Comparatively speaking, Apache 1 PHP i

Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache2

2003-08-09 Thread Ilia Alshanetsky
> Are these bugs related to Apache2 interface or Apache2 multithreaded > (worker) ? Both. Ilia -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php