Re: [PHP-DEV] Any chance of having __invokeStatic()

2011-11-28 Thread Evan Coury
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Nikita Popov wrote: > How would this be different from defining a function MyClass? Actually, I just found myself wanting this the other day. The class name in question was being defined in a config file, which the user would be free to override with their own cla

Re: [PHP-DEV] Any chance of having __invokeStatic()

2011-11-28 Thread Nikita Popov
How would this be different from defining a function MyClass? Nikita On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Dmitri Snytkine wrote: > I think __invokeStatic() would be a very useful magic function, especially > with support for late static binding. > you could difine it one and all sub-classes will hav

[PHP-DEV] Any chance of having __invokeStatic()

2011-11-28 Thread Dmitri Snytkine
I think __invokeStatic() would be a very useful magic function, especially with support for late static binding. you could difine it one and all sub-classes will have that option of basically being callable classes. MyClass($params) could then do some processing and return some data. This would b